Majority vote

Line 52:

==Study Resources==

In contemporary jurisprudential books, especially those that deal with issues of governance in Islam and the [[Wilayat al-Faqih|issue of Wilayat al-Faqih]], sections have been dedicated to the issue of the majority vote. One of the first works that has substantiated the position of the majority vote based on religious teachings is the book [[Tanbih al-Ummah wa Tanzih al-Millah]] by [[Mohammad-Hossein Gharavi Na'ini]]. In the first volume of the book [[Dirasat fi Wilayat al-Faqih wa Fiqh al-Dawlah al-Islamiyyah]] by [[Hussein-Ali Montazeri]], there are also references to this discussion.

In contemporary jurisprudential books, especially those that deal with issues of governance in Islam and the [[Wilayat al-Faqih|issue of Wilayat al-Faqih]], sections have been dedicated to the issue of the majority vote. One of the first works that has substantiated the position of the majority vote based on religious teachings is the book [[Tanbih al-Ummah wa Tanzih al-Millah]] by [[Mirza Mohammad-Hossein Gharavi Na'ini]]. In the first volume of the book [[Dirasat fi Wilayat al-Faqih wa Fiqh al-Dawlah al-Islamiyyah]] by [[Hussein-Ali Montazeri]], there are also references to this discussion.

Regarding the validity and position of the majority vote in contemporary Shia jurisprudence, books and articles have also been written independently. Among these books is [[The Rational and Religious Validity of the Majority Vote]] by Masoud Emami. Articles such as "The Validity of the Majority Vote in Light of the Book and the Sunnah" by Masoud Emami, "The Validity and Position of the Majority Vote in the Political System of Islam" by Ruhollah Shakeri and Hossein Rajaei, "The Position of Minority and Majority in Islamic Political Thought" by Abolfazl Mousavian, and "The Validity of the Majority Vote" by [[Kazem Qazizadeh]] have also examined this issue from the perspective of Shia jurisprudence.

@@ Line 52: / Line 52: @@
 ==Study Resources==
 {{Main|Majority Vote (Study Resources)}}
-In contemporary jurisprudential books, especially those that deal with issues of governance in Islam and the [[Wilayat al-Faqih|issue of Wilayat al-Faqih]], sections have been dedicated to the issue of the majority vote. One of the first works that has substantiated the position of the majority vote based on religious teachings is the book [[Tanbih al-Ummah wa Tanzih al-Millah]] by [[Mohammad-Hossein Gharavi Na'ini]]. In the first volume of the book [[Dirasat fi Wilayat al-Faqih wa Fiqh al-Dawlah al-Islamiyyah]] by [[Hussein-Ali Montazeri]], there are also references to this discussion.
+In contemporary jurisprudential books, especially those that deal with issues of governance in Islam and the [[Wilayat al-Faqih|issue of Wilayat al-Faqih]], sections have been dedicated to the issue of the majority vote. One of the first works that has substantiated the position of the majority vote based on religious teachings is the book [[Tanbih al-Ummah wa Tanzih al-Millah]] by [[Mirza Mohammad-Hossein Gharavi Na'ini]]. In the first volume of the book [[Dirasat fi Wilayat al-Faqih wa Fiqh al-Dawlah al-Islamiyyah]] by [[Hussein-Ali Montazeri]], there are also references to this discussion.
 Regarding the validity and position of the majority vote in contemporary Shia jurisprudence, books and articles have also been written independently. Among these books is [[The Rational and Religious Validity of the Majority Vote]] by Masoud Emami. Articles such as "The Validity of the Majority Vote in Light of the Book and the Sunnah" by Masoud Emami, "The Validity and Position of the Majority Vote in the Political System of Islam" by Ruhollah Shakeri and Hossein Rajaei, "The Position of Minority and Majority in Islamic Political Thought" by Abolfazl Mousavian, and "The Validity of the Majority Vote" by [[Kazem Qazizadeh]] have also examined this issue from the perspective of Shia jurisprudence.

Majority vote: Difference between revisions