Brain Death: Legal-Jurisprudential Processing (book): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
The author considers the validity of the taste of the Sharia as a result of the validity of customary certainty because in his opinion, the taste of the Sharia is nothing but a customary understanding resulting from the accumulation of suspicion. Without keeping in mind the ruling of reason, and without carefully and reflecting on the book, Sunnah and the statements of the jurists, and without knowing the different areas of the subject and distinguishing the rulings of prohibition and devotion, it is not possible to achieve the taste of Sharia (p. 161). | The author considers the validity of the taste of the Sharia as a result of the validity of customary certainty because in his opinion, the taste of the Sharia is nothing but a customary understanding resulting from the accumulation of suspicion. Without keeping in mind the ruling of reason, and without carefully and reflecting on the book, Sunnah and the statements of the jurists, and without knowing the different areas of the subject and distinguishing the rulings of prohibition and devotion, it is not possible to achieve the taste of Sharia (p. 161). | ||
[[fa:مرگ مغزی: پردازش فقهی حقوقی (کتاب)]] | [[fa:مرگ مغزی: پردازش فقهی حقوقی (کتاب)]] | ||
[[ | [[Category:Articles by Mohammad Kazem Haqani Fazel]] | ||
[[ | [[Category:Books on Brain Death]] | ||
[[ | [[Category:Books published by the Fiqhi Center of the Infallible Imams (AS)]] | ||
[[Category:Books by Hamid Setoudah]] | |||
[[Category:Book review]] | [[Category:Book review]] | ||