Foundations of Islamic Political Thought (Book): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
The author believes that in the political teachings of the Quran, both types of analysis, comparative and normative, along with the three mentioned stages, are observable. He then proceeds to examine Quranic examples to prove his claim (pp. 35-39). | The author believes that in the political teachings of the Quran, both types of analysis, comparative and normative, along with the three mentioned stages, are observable. He then proceeds to examine Quranic examples to prove his claim (pp. 35-39). | ||
According to Amid Zanjani, jurists, in their examination of the sources of ijtihad, have paid less attention to analyzing the first stage of political thought, but their jurisprudential opinions are rich with views on the second and third stages. He considers the opinions of jurists (such as Shaykh al-Tusi in Al-Mabsut, Allama al-Hilli in Tadhkirat al-Fuqaha, Allama al-Naraqi in 'Awa'id al-Ayyam, Mir Fattah in the book 'Anawin, Kashif al-Ghita in Kashf al-Ghita, [[ | According to Amid Zanjani, jurists, in their examination of the sources of ijtihad, have paid less attention to analyzing the first stage of political thought, but their jurisprudential opinions are rich with views on the second and third stages. He considers the opinions of jurists (such as Shaykh al-Tusi in Al-Mabsut, Allama al-Hilli in Tadhkirat al-Fuqaha, Allama al-Naraqi in 'Awa'id al-Ayyam, Mir Fattah in the book 'Anawin, Kashif al-Ghita in Kashf al-Ghita, [[Mirza Mohammad-Hossein Gharavi Na'ini|Muhammad Husayn Na'ini]] in the book [[Tanbih al-Umma wa Tanzih al-Milla (Book)|Tanbih al-Umma]], and [[Sayyid Ruhollah Musavi Khomeini|Imam Khomeini]] in the treatise Wilayat al-Faqih and the book Al-Bay') to be a great heritage in the field of political thought and finds their views very helpful in extracting jurisprudential answers to contemporary political issues (p. 40). | ||
The author, continuing the discussions of the first chapter, refers to the two elements of time and place in shaping Islamic political thought (p. 42) and examines the empirical, philosophical, and Islamic methods for understanding Islamic political thought (pp. 45-48). He has rejected the application of the empirical method of positivism in Islamic thought (p. 51). | The author, continuing the discussions of the first chapter, refers to the two elements of time and place in shaping Islamic political thought (p. 42) and examines the empirical, philosophical, and Islamic methods for understanding Islamic political thought (pp. 45-48). He has rejected the application of the empirical method of positivism in Islamic thought (p. 51). | ||
| Line 123: | Line 123: | ||
* The role of reason in the derivation of Islamic rulings: Reason is one of the jurisprudential sources that plays an important role in the derivation of Islamic rulings, both in the theoretical and practical domains. God has permitted man to benefit from this divine right and to participate in law-making, which is a sign of the dignity and respect for man in the Islamic view (p. 340). | * The role of reason in the derivation of Islamic rulings: Reason is one of the jurisprudential sources that plays an important role in the derivation of Islamic rulings, both in the theoretical and practical domains. God has permitted man to benefit from this divine right and to participate in law-making, which is a sign of the dignity and respect for man in the Islamic view (p. 340). | ||
[[Category:Books on Political Fiqh in Persian]] | [[Category:Books on Political Fiqh in Persian]] | ||
[[Category:Books by Abbasali Amid Zanjani]] | [[Category:Books by Abbasali Amid Zanjani]] | ||
[[ | [[Category:Bibliography Articles]] | ||