Fiqh Quarterly Journal: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* '''abstract''' | * '''abstract''' | ||
'''The Fiqh (jurisprudence) Quarterly''' (in persian: [https://ency.feqhemoaser.com/fa/view/%D9%81%D8%B5%D9%84%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%87_%D9%81%D9%82%D9%87 فصلنامه فقه]) is a scientific-research journal on new jurisprudential issues, owned by the [[Islamic Sciences and Culture Academy]]. This journal has been published to enhance the capabilities of jurisprudence for entering the governmental and social spheres of the contemporary era. The Fiqh quarterly holds significance and a prominent position in [[contemporary jurisprudence]] due to its focus on emerging issues and topics such as governmental rulings, [[legal personality]], modern medical rulings ([[medical jurisprudence]]), the role of custom in jurisprudence, rulings on [[hijab]] (whether it is mandated or not), the [[majority vote|majority opinion]], and etc. | '''The Fiqh (jurisprudence) Quarterly''' (in persian: [https://ency.feqhemoaser.com/fa/view/%D9%81%D8%B5%D9%84%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%87_%D9%81%D9%82%D9%87 فصلنامه فقه]) is a scientific-research journal on new jurisprudential issues, owned by the [[Islamic Sciences and Culture Academy]]. This journal has been published to enhance the capabilities of jurisprudence for entering the governmental and social spheres of the contemporary era. The Fiqh quarterly holds significance and a prominent position in [[contemporary jurisprudence]] due to its focus on emerging issues and topics such as governmental rulings, [[legal personality]], modern medical rulings ([[medical jurisprudence]]), the role of custom in jurisprudence, rulings on [[hijab]] (whether it is mandated or not), the [[majority vote|majority opinion]], and etc. | ||
Contributors to this journal include [[Mohammad | Contributors to this journal include [[Mohammad-Ebrahim Jannati Shahroudi]], [[Abulqasim Alidust|Abulqāsim Ali-Dūst]], [[Sayyid Mohammad-Ali Ayazi|Sayyid Mohammad-Ali Āyāzī]], [[Mohammad-Mahdi Asifi|Mohammad-Mahdī Āṣifī]], [[Ziya Murtazavi|Sayyid Ḍiyā’ Murtaḍavī]], [[Mohammad-Hadi Ma'rifat|Mohammad-Hādī Ma‘rifat]] and [[Sayyid Abbas Musaviyan|Sayyid ‘Abbās Mūsavīyān]]. Naqd va Barrisī-yi Adilli-yi Fiqhī-yi Ilzām-i Ḥukūmatī-yi Ḥijāb (critique and analysis of jurisprudential reasons for the governmental enforcement of hijab), Niẓārat bar Qudrat dar Fiqh (oversight of power in jurisprudence), Chālishhā-yi Ijtimā‘ī va ‘Ilmī-yi Shabīhsāzī-yi Insān (social and scientific challenges of [[human cloning]]), Barrisī-yi Manābi‘-i Fiqhī-yi Rajm (Sangsār) Thubūtan va Ithbātan (examination of jurisprudential sources of [[stoning]] in terms of affirmation and proof), Ḥujjīyyat-i Dhātī-yi Banāhā-yi ‘Uqalā’ī va Ta’thīr-i ān dar Fiqh va Uṣūl (the inherent validity of rational constructs and their impact on jurisprudence and its principles), and I‘tibār-i Ra’y-i Aktharīyyat dar Partu-i Kitāb va Sunnat (the validity of the [[majority vote]] in light of the Quran and Sunnah) are among the important articles of this journal. | ||
==Introduction== | ==Introduction== | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
* [[Sajjad Izadi|Sayyid Sajjād Īzdihī]] | * [[Sajjad Izadi|Sayyid Sajjād Īzdihī]] | ||
* [[Sayyid Hasan Islami Ardakani|Sayyid Hasan Islāmī]] | * [[Sayyid Hasan Islami Ardakani|Sayyid Hasan Islāmī]] | ||
* [[Mohammad- | * [[Mohammad-Ebrahim Jannati Shahroudi]] | ||
* Hasan Javāhirī | * Hasan Javāhirī | ||
* [[Alireza Arafi|Ali-Riḍā A‘rāfī]] | * [[Alireza Arafi|Ali-Riḍā A‘rāfī]] | ||
| Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
* Niẓārat bar Qudrat dar Fiqh (oversight of power in jurisprudence), by [[Sajjad Izadi|Sayyid Sajjād Īzdihī]] | * Niẓārat bar Qudrat dar Fiqh (oversight of power in jurisprudence), by [[Sajjad Izadi|Sayyid Sajjād Īzdihī]] | ||
* Chālishhā-yi Ijtimā‘ī va ‘Ilmī-yi Shabīhsāzī-yi Insān (social and scientific challenges of human cloning), by [[Sayyid Hasan Islami Ardakani|Sayyid Hasan Islāmī]] | * Chālishhā-yi Ijtimā‘ī va ‘Ilmī-yi Shabīhsāzī-yi Insān (social and scientific challenges of human cloning), by [[Sayyid Hasan Islami Ardakani|Sayyid Hasan Islāmī]] | ||
* Barrisī-yi Manābi‘-i Fiqhī-yi Rajm (Sangsār) Thubūtan va Ithbātan (examination of the jurisprudential documents for stoning in terms of affirmation and proof), by [[Mohammad- | * Barrisī-yi Manābi‘-i Fiqhī-yi Rajm (Sangsār) Thubūtan va Ithbātan (examination of the jurisprudential documents for stoning in terms of affirmation and proof), by [[Mohammad-Ebrahim Jannati Shahroudi]] | ||
* Taqsīm-i Janīnī va Shabīhsāzī (embryo splitting and cloning), by Hasan Javāhirī | * Taqsīm-i Janīnī va Shabīhsāzī (embryo splitting and cloning), by Hasan Javāhirī | ||
* Ḥujjīyyat-i Dhātī-yi Banāhā-yi ‘Uqalā’ī va Ta’thīr-i ān dar Fiqh va Uṣūl (the intrinsic validity of rational constructs and their effect on jurisprudence and its principles), by Mohammad-Taqī Akbarnizhād | * Ḥujjīyyat-i Dhātī-yi Banāhā-yi ‘Uqalā’ī va Ta’thīr-i ān dar Fiqh va Uṣūl (the intrinsic validity of rational constructs and their effect on jurisprudence and its principles), by Mohammad-Taqī Akbarnizhād | ||