Sayyid Abu al-Hasan Musawi Isfahani: Difference between revisions
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
=== Credible and Documentary Financial Value of Paper Money === | === Credible and Documentary Financial Value of Paper Money === | ||
On the basis of some understanding of his fatwas in Wasilat al-Najat, it is said that Isfahani did not consider fiat money, such as banknotes, to possess independent financial value; rather, he perceived them as documents representing dirhams and dinars, acting as alternative of gold and silver. Hence, he did not consider the credit transaction ( | On the basis of some understanding of his fatwas in Wasilat al-Najat, it is said that Isfahani did not consider fiat money, such as banknotes, to possess independent financial value; rather, he perceived them as documents representing dirhams and dinars, acting as alternative of gold and silver. Hence, he did not consider the credit transaction (Nasi'a) of this type of money permissible, because they lack intrinsic financial value and have only gained validity backed by precious metals. It is said that this view is rooted in traditional jurisprudential foundations, which consider financial value to be dependent on tangibility and consumability.<ref>Davoudi, Naqsh-e Foqaha-ye Shi'eh dar Hall-e Masa'il-e Mustahdatha, p. 211.</ref> | ||
=== Lack of father's Guardianship over the Virgin Girl on the Marriage Contract === | === Lack of father's Guardianship over the Virgin Girl on the Marriage Contract === | ||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
=== Opposition to Tatbir and Extremism === | === Opposition to Tatbir and Extremism === | ||
Sayyid Abu al-Hasan Isfahani, according to some reports, opposed [[Tatbir|Tatbir (Qameh-Zani)]] as an irrational act that causes the defamation of Shia.<ref>Ahmadvand, "Nogarayi-e Reza Shah va Iqdamat-e Ayatollah Isfahani", p. 111.</ref> This perspective of Isfahani, according to some analyses, demonstrates his concern for being rational and his effort to honour religious | Sayyid Abu al-Hasan Isfahani, according to some reports, opposed [[Tatbir|Tatbir (Qameh-Zani)]] as an irrational act that causes the defamation of Shia.<ref>Ahmadvand, "Nogarayi-e Reza Shah va Iqdamat-e Ayatollah Isfahani", p. 111.</ref> This perspective of Isfahani, according to some analyses, demonstrates his concern for being rational and his effort to honour religious rituals (Sha'a'ir) and protect religious rits from distortions and extremism.<ref>Ayazi, Rah-e Afsaneh, vol. 2, p. 274.</ref> | ||
=== Prohibition of Painting and Sculpting Human Figures, and Sleight of Hand === | === Prohibition of Painting and Sculpting Human Figures, and Sleight of Hand === | ||
According to Isfahani's fatwa, painting humans and making statues of them is forbidden, and he | According to Isfahani's fatwa, painting humans and making statues of them is forbidden, and he most likely tends to avoid painting animals; however, painting or sculpting inanimate objects is permissible.<ref>Isfahani, Sirat al-Najat, vol. 1, p. 22.</ref> He also took [[Sleight of hand|sleight of hand]] (i.e. unreal displays facilitated by the speed of movements) as a type of magic (Sihr), considering it forbidden.<ref>Isfahani, Sirat al-Najat, vol. 1, p. 24.</ref> | ||
== Footnotes == | == Footnotes == | ||