Weapons of Mass Destruction: Difference between revisions
Created page with "{{Author |author = MohammadMahdi Emadi |author2 = |author3 = |compiler = |editor1 = |editor2 = |editor3 = }} * '''abstract''' Whether microbial, nuclear, or chemical weapons, weapons of mass destruction are among the new war tools that were produced alongside the emergence of industry and the advancement of science. As a result, new issues and rulings have also entered scientific and jurisprudential discussions. This topic has not been men..." |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Author | {{Author | ||
|author = | |author = Mohammad Mahdi Emadi | ||
|author2 = | |author2 = | ||
|author3 = | |author3 = | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
}} | }} | ||
* '''abstract''' | * '''abstract''' | ||
Whether microbial, nuclear, or chemical weapons, [[weapons of mass destruction]] are among the new [[war]] tools that were produced alongside the emergence of industry and the advancement of science. As a result, new issues and rulings have also entered scientific and [[jurisprudence|jurisprudential]] discussions. This topic has not been mentioned directly in religious texts and the jurists have extracted its ruling from generalities, applications, and common laws. What is included in the use of [[weapons of mass destruction]] is the killing of defenseless people and civilians and the destruction of their property far from the conflict scene. In addition, they are in support of Islamic rights because the principle of separation in goals is considered one of the absolute principles of [[jihad]] in Islam. A group of jurists have issued a [[fatwa]] regarding the sanctity of production and maintenance and many of them have issued a fatwa on the sanctity of using this type of weapon. Also, in the position of dealing with the similitude, some fatwas have been given on sanctity and some have considered it permissible. In case of necessity or emergency, many jurists have accepted the use of these weapons as permissible. | '''Weapons of Mass Destruction (in Persian: [[:fa:سلاحهای_کشتارجمعی|سلاحهای کشتارجمعی]])''' Whether microbial, nuclear, or chemical weapons, [[weapons of mass destruction]] are among the new [[war]] tools that were produced alongside the emergence of industry and the advancement of science. As a result, new issues and rulings have also entered scientific and [[jurisprudence|jurisprudential]] discussions. This topic has not been mentioned directly in religious texts and the jurists have extracted its ruling from generalities, applications, and common laws. What is included in the use of [[weapons of mass destruction]] is the killing of defenseless people and civilians and the destruction of their property far from the conflict scene. In addition, they are in support of Islamic rights because the principle of separation in goals is considered one of the absolute principles of [[jihad]] in Islam. A group of jurists have issued a [[fatwa]] regarding the sanctity of production and maintenance and many of them have issued a fatwa on the sanctity of using this type of weapon. Also, in the position of dealing with the similitude, some fatwas have been given on sanctity and some have considered it permissible. In case of necessity or emergency, many jurists have accepted the use of these weapons as permissible. | ||
==The Problem of the Study and its Significance== | ==The Problem of the Study and its Significance== | ||
| Line 163: | Line 163: | ||
[[fa:سلاحهای کشتارجمعی]] | [[fa:سلاحهای کشتارجمعی]] | ||
[[Category:Contemporary Jurisprudence Articles]] | |||