Jurisprudence and Law (book): Difference between revisions
Created page with "{{Author |author = Alireza Salehi |author2 = |author3 = |compiler = |editor1 = |editor2 = |editor3 = }} * '''abstract''' '''Jurisprudence and Law: Ideas, proposals and methodological solutions (Book)''' (in persian: [https://ency.feqhemoaser.com/fa/view/%D9%81%D9%82%D9%87_%D9%88_%D9%82%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%88%D9%86_(%DA%A9%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%A8) فقه و قانون (کتاب)]) is a Persian book containing 24 articles by different authors about legislation based on Is..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
[[Mohammad Javad Arasta]], the faculty member of [[University of Tehran]], first determines the nature of the approvals of the [[Parliament of Iran|Islamic Council]] in order to explain the relationship between the [[governmental ruling|government decree]] and the approved law. According to him, the approvals of the parliament can be divided into three main categories: clarification of [[Sharia]] ruling, recognition of the issue of [[Sharia]] ruling, and planning for the appropriate implementation of divine rulings (p. 666-668). He contends that the third activity of the parliament, i.e., planning for the implementation of divine decrees, will be an example of the [[governmental ruling|ruling of the government]]. The obligation of people to use a particular method (such as punishing different drivers with financial fines) to fulfill some duties and leaving some taboos and not to use other methods will be a result of the [[governmental ruling|government decree]] (p. 668-669). He also believes that the type of approvals of the [[Expediency Discernment Council]] to resolve the dispute between the parliament and the [[Guardian Council]] will be an example of a [[governmental ruling|government order]] (p. 670-660). | [[Mohammad Javad Arasta]], the faculty member of [[University of Tehran]], first determines the nature of the approvals of the [[Parliament of Iran|Islamic Council]] in order to explain the relationship between the [[governmental ruling|government decree]] and the approved law. According to him, the approvals of the parliament can be divided into three main categories: clarification of [[Sharia]] ruling, recognition of the issue of [[Sharia]] ruling, and planning for the appropriate implementation of divine rulings (p. 666-668). He contends that the third activity of the parliament, i.e., planning for the implementation of divine decrees, will be an example of the [[governmental ruling|ruling of the government]]. The obligation of people to use a particular method (such as punishing different drivers with financial fines) to fulfill some duties and leaving some taboos and not to use other methods will be a result of the [[governmental ruling|government decree]] (p. 668-669). He also believes that the type of approvals of the [[Expediency Discernment Council]] to resolve the dispute between the parliament and the [[Guardian Council]] will be an example of a [[governmental ruling|government order]] (p. 670-660). | ||
[[fa:فقه و قانون (کتاب)]] | [[fa:فقه و قانون (کتاب)]] | ||
[[category: book review]] | [[category: book review]] | ||