Brain Death: Legal-Jurisprudential Processing (book): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Author | {{Author | ||
|author = Mohammad Kazem | |author = Mohammad Kazem Haghani Fazl | ||
|author2 = | |author2 = | ||
|author3 = | |author3 = | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
'''abstract''' | '''abstract''' | ||
'''Brain Death: Legal-Jurisprudential Processing''' (in persian: [https://ency.feqhemoaser.com/fa/view/%D9%85%D8%B1%DA%AF_%D9%85%D8%BA%D8%B2%DB%8C:_%D9%BE%D8%B1%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B2%D8%B4_%D9%81%D9%82%D9%87%DB%8C_%D8%AD%D9%82%D9%88%D9%82%DB%8C_(%DA%A9%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%A8) مرگ مغزی: پردازش فقهی-حقوقی]) is a book in the field of [[Contemporary jurisprudence|contemporary jurisprudence]] written by Hamid Sotoudeh, which was published by the Jurisprudence Center of Aemmeye Athar (PBUT). This book is one of the first and few works that consider the phenomenon of [[Brain | '''Brain Death: Legal-Jurisprudential Processing''' (in persian: [https://ency.feqhemoaser.com/fa/view/%D9%85%D8%B1%DA%AF_%D9%85%D8%BA%D8%B2%DB%8C:_%D9%BE%D8%B1%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B2%D8%B4_%D9%81%D9%82%D9%87%DB%8C_%D8%AD%D9%82%D9%88%D9%82%DB%8C_(%DA%A9%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%A8) مرگ مغزی: پردازش فقهی-حقوقی]) is a book in the field of [[Contemporary jurisprudence|contemporary jurisprudence]] written by Hamid Sotoudeh, which was published by the Jurisprudence Center of Aemmeye Athar (PBUT). This book is one of the first and few works that consider the phenomenon of [[Brain Death]] and its jurisprudential and legal consequences in Persian language. The author considers brain death to be the same as death, but he believes that rules such as shroud and burial, which are imposed on the death of a corpse, do not apply here, but such a person is condemned to confinement, invalidation of power of attorney, guardianship, and the like. The most important result of accepting the death of a brain death patient is the permission to remove his organs for [[Transplantation|transplantation]], which the author considers permissible based on the [[Taste of Sharia|taste of Sharia]]. | ||
==Brief Overview== | ==Brief Overview== | ||
The book Brain Death, Jurisprudential Processing written by Hamid Sotoudeh is one of the many works published by [[The Jurisprudence Center of A’emmeye Athar (PBUT)|the Jurisprudence Center of A’emmeye Athar (PBUT)]]. This book focuses on the phenomenon of brain death and examines its jurisprudential and legal effects. Following the preface, the book is divided into three parts, a foreword and two appendices at the end. The author has explained his main claims in the second and third parts. Considering the publication of the book in 2012, it can be considered as one of the first books written on the brain death. | The book Brain Death, Jurisprudential Processing written by Hamid Sotoudeh is one of the many works published by [[The Jurisprudence Center of A’emmeye Athar (PBUT)|the Jurisprudence Center of A’emmeye Athar (PBUT)]]. This book focuses on the phenomenon of brain death and examines its jurisprudential and legal effects. Following the preface, the book is divided into three parts, a foreword and two appendices at the end. The author has explained his main claims in the second and third parts. Considering the publication of the book in 2012, it can be considered as one of the first books written on the brain death. | ||
| Line 78: | Line 79: | ||
The author considers the validity of the taste of the Sharia as a result of the validity of customary certainty because in his opinion, the taste of the Sharia is nothing but a customary understanding resulting from the accumulation of suspicion. Without keeping in mind the ruling of reason, and without carefully and reflecting on the book, Sunnah and the statements of the jurists, and without knowing the different areas of the subject and distinguishing the rulings of prohibition and devotion, it is not possible to achieve the taste of Sharia (p. 161). | The author considers the validity of the taste of the Sharia as a result of the validity of customary certainty because in his opinion, the taste of the Sharia is nothing but a customary understanding resulting from the accumulation of suspicion. Without keeping in mind the ruling of reason, and without carefully and reflecting on the book, Sunnah and the statements of the jurists, and without knowing the different areas of the subject and distinguishing the rulings of prohibition and devotion, it is not possible to achieve the taste of Sharia (p. 161). | ||
[[fa:مرگ مغزی: پردازش فقهی حقوقی (کتاب)]] | [[fa:مرگ مغزی: پردازش فقهی حقوقی (کتاب)]] | ||
[[Category:Articles by Mohammad Kazem | [[Category:Articles by Mohammad Kazem Haghani Fazl]] | ||
[[Category:Books on Brain Death]] | [[Category:Books on Brain Death]] | ||
[[Category:Books published by the Fiqhi Center of the Infallible Imams (AS)]] | [[Category:Books published by the Fiqhi Center of the Infallible Imams (AS)]] | ||
[[Category:Books by Hamid | [[Category:Books by Hamid Sotoudeh]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Bibliography Articles]] | ||