Brain Death: Difference between revisions

Sarfipour (talk | contribs)
Sarfipour (talk | contribs)
Line 65: Line 65:


== Study Resources ==
== Study Resources ==
Numerous works in Persian and Arabic languages and in the form of books, articles, and theses have examined brain death jurisprudentially. Among these works, one can mention the book Brain Death from the Perspective of Jurisprudence and Law; Muḥammad Raḥmatī in this book, after conceptualizing death and life in jurisprudential sources and medical texts, mentions the reasons of supporters and opponents of the vitality of a brain-dead patient and examines the permissibility of organ transplantation from a brain-dead patient. He also, in collaboration with ʿAlī Akbar Farahzādī, has authored an article titled “Study of Brain Death from the Perspective of Jurisprudence and Criminal Law” and after conceptual explanation and argumentative examination of the issue, in the position of conclusion, has stated that the criterion for human life is the connection of soul and body, and since this connection is through the brain, a brain-dead patient has the ruling of a dead human. The book [[Organ Transplantation and Brain Death in the Mirror of Jurisprudence (book)|Organ Transplantation and Brain Death in the Mirror of Jurisprudence]] written by Sayyid Muḥsin Mortażavī and the book [[Brain Death: Legal-Jurisprudential Processing (book)|Brain Death: Legal-Jurisprudential Processing]] written by Ḥamīd Sotūdeh, and [[Mawt al-Dimagh fi al-Fiqh al-Islami (book)|Mawt al-Dimāgh fī al-Fiqh al-Islāmī]] written by Masʿūd Ṣabrī which has been published in Egypt are other published works in this field.
A considerable body of literature in Persian and Arabic, including books, articles, and academic theses, has examined the issue of brain death from a jurisprudential perspective. Among the notable works in this field is *Brain Death from the Perspective of Jurisprudence and Law*, in which Muḥammad Raḥmatī discusses the concepts of death and life as presented in jurisprudential sources and medical texts, outlines the arguments of both proponents and opponents of considering brain-dead patients alive, and examines the permissibility of organ transplantation in such cases. Raḥmatī has also co-authored, with ʿAlī Akbar Farahzādī, an article entitled “Study of Brain Death from the Perspective of Jurisprudence and Criminal Law,in which the issue is analyzed conceptually and argumentatively, concluding that human life depends on the connection between soul and body and that, since this connection is mediated through the brain, a brain-dead patient is to be regarded as legally deceased.
 
Other significant works include [[Organ Transplantation and Brain Death in the Mirror of Jurisprudence (book)|*Organ Transplantation and Brain Death in the Mirror of Jurisprudence*]] by Sayyid Muḥsin Mortażavī, [[Brain Death: Legal-Jurisprudential Processing (book)|*Brain Death: Legal-Jurisprudential Processing*]] by Ḥamīd Sotūdeh, and [[Mawt al-Dimagh fi al-Fiqh al-Islami (book)|*Mawt al-Dimāgh fī al-Fiqh al-Islāmī*]] by Masʿūd Ṣabrī, published in Egypt.


== references ==
== references ==