Brain Death: Difference between revisions
| Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
== Study Resources == | == Study Resources == | ||
A considerable body of literature in Persian and Arabic, including books, articles, and academic theses, has examined the issue of brain death from a jurisprudential perspective. Among the notable works in this field is *Brain Death from the Perspective of Jurisprudence and Law*, in which Muḥammad Raḥmatī discusses the concepts of death and life as presented in jurisprudential sources and medical texts, outlines the arguments of both proponents and opponents of considering brain-dead patients alive, and examines the permissibility of organ transplantation in such cases. Raḥmatī has also co-authored, with ʿAlī Akbar Farahzādī, an article entitled “Study of Brain Death from the Perspective of Jurisprudence and Criminal Law,” in which the issue is analyzed conceptually and argumentatively, concluding that human life depends on the connection between soul and body and that, since this connection is mediated through the brain, a brain-dead patient is to be regarded as legally deceased. | |||
Other significant works include [[Organ Transplantation and Brain Death in the Mirror of Jurisprudence (book)|*Organ Transplantation and Brain Death in the Mirror of Jurisprudence*]] by Sayyid Muḥsin Mortażavī, [[Brain Death: Legal-Jurisprudential Processing (book)|*Brain Death: Legal-Jurisprudential Processing*]] by Ḥamīd Sotūdeh, and [[Mawt al-Dimagh fi al-Fiqh al-Islami (book)|*Mawt al-Dimāgh fī al-Fiqh al-Islāmī*]] by Masʿūd Ṣabrī, published in Egypt. | |||
== references == | == references == | ||