Jurisprudence and Law (book)

Line 70:

===Types of relationship between jurisprudence and law===

The examination of different forms of the relationship between [[jurisprudence]] and [[law]] was done by [[Khaled al-Ghafouri]], a member of the academic staff of [[Al-Mustafa International University|Al-Mustafa University]] and the editor-in-chief of the [[Ahl al-Bayt Jurisprudence Quarterly]], and by [[Ahmad Moballeghi]], a lecturer of [[Kharij Fiqh|Karej Feqh]] and [[Usul al-fiqh|Osoul]]. In the article "Is it necessary for the law to be in accordance with [[jurisprudence]] or is it sufficient not to disagree with it?", [[Khaled al-Ghafouri]] refers to three forms of complete compliance (p. 168), non-conflict (p. 170) and harmony between [[jurisprudence]] and law (p. 173). After examining the problems and answering them in all three forms, he accepts the relationship of coordination (p. 185).

The examination of different forms of the relationship between jurisprudence and [[law]] was done by [[Khaled al-Ghafouri]], a member of the academic staff of [[Al-Mustafa International University|Al-Mustafa University]] and the editor-in-chief of the [[Ahl al-Bayt Jurisprudence Quarterly]], and by [[Ahmad Moballeghi]], a lecturer of [[Kharij Fiqh|Karej Feqh]] and [[Usul al-fiqh|Osoul]]. In the article "Is it necessary for the law to be in accordance with jurisprudence or is it sufficient not to disagree with it?", [[Khaled al-Ghafouri]] refers to three forms of complete compliance (p. 168), non-conflict (p. 170) and harmony between jurisprudence and law (p. 173). After examining the problems and answering them in all three forms, he accepts the relationship of coordination (p. 185).

By extracting the concepts found in [[jurisprudence]] books, [[Ahmad Moballeghi]] achieves six types of relationship between [[jurisprudence]] and [[law]], which extends from the originality of jurisprudence to the originality of law. Law being a vessel for [[jurisprudence]], the union and annihilation of [[jurisprudence]] and law in each other, determination of limits and boundaries by [[jurisprudence]], [[jurisprudence]] as the spirit of law, [[jurisprudence]] as a source of law, and the guarantee of [[jurisprudence]] in law are among these relationships (pp. 197-192).

By extracting the concepts found in jurisprudence books, [[Ahmad Moballeghi]] achieves six types of relationship between jurisprudence and [[law]], which extends from the originality of jurisprudence to the originality of law. Law being a vessel for jurisprudence, the union and annihilation of jurisprudence and law in each other, determination of limits and boundaries by jurisprudence, jurisprudence as the spirit of law, jurisprudence as a source of law, and the guarantee of jurisprudence in law are among these relationships (pp. 197-192).

===Converting jurisprudence into law===

@@ Line 70: / Line 70: @@
 ===Types of relationship between jurisprudence and law===
-The examination of different forms of the relationship between [[jurisprudence]] and [[law]] was done by [[Khaled al-Ghafouri]], a member of the academic staff of [[Al-Mustafa International University|Al-Mustafa University]] and the editor-in-chief of the [[Ahl al-Bayt Jurisprudence Quarterly]], and by [[Ahmad Moballeghi]], a lecturer of [[Kharij Fiqh|Karej Feqh]] and [[Usul al-fiqh|Osoul]]. In the article "Is it necessary for the law to be in accordance with [[jurisprudence]] or is it sufficient not to disagree with it?", [[Khaled al-Ghafouri]] refers to three forms of complete compliance (p. 168), non-conflict (p. 170) and harmony between [[jurisprudence]] and law (p. 173). After examining the problems and answering them in all three forms, he accepts the relationship of coordination (p. 185).
+The examination of different forms of the relationship between jurisprudence and [[law]] was done by [[Khaled al-Ghafouri]], a member of the academic staff of [[Al-Mustafa International University|Al-Mustafa University]] and the editor-in-chief of the [[Ahl al-Bayt Jurisprudence Quarterly]], and by [[Ahmad Moballeghi]], a lecturer of [[Kharij Fiqh|Karej Feqh]] and [[Usul al-fiqh|Osoul]]. In the article "Is it necessary for the law to be in accordance with jurisprudence or is it sufficient not to disagree with it?", [[Khaled al-Ghafouri]] refers to three forms of complete compliance (p. 168), non-conflict (p. 170) and harmony between jurisprudence and law (p. 173). After examining the problems and answering them in all three forms, he accepts the relationship of coordination (p. 185).
-By extracting the concepts found in [[jurisprudence]] books, [[Ahmad Moballeghi]] achieves six types of relationship between [[jurisprudence]] and [[law]], which extends from the originality of jurisprudence to the originality of law. Law being a vessel for [[jurisprudence]], the union and annihilation of [[jurisprudence]] and law in each other, determination of limits and boundaries by [[jurisprudence]], [[jurisprudence]] as the spirit of law, [[jurisprudence]] as a source of law, and the guarantee of [[jurisprudence]] in law are among these relationships (pp. 197-192).
+By extracting the concepts found in jurisprudence books, [[Ahmad Moballeghi]] achieves six types of relationship between jurisprudence and [[law]], which extends from the originality of jurisprudence to the originality of law. Law being a vessel for jurisprudence, the union and annihilation of jurisprudence and law in each other, determination of limits and boundaries by jurisprudence, jurisprudence as the spirit of law, jurisprudence as a source of law, and the guarantee of jurisprudence in law are among these relationships (pp. 197-192).
 ===Converting jurisprudence into law===

Jurisprudence and Law (book): Difference between revisions