Turning Jurisprudential Rules into Law: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
==Further reading== | ==Further reading== | ||
Converting Islamic jurisprudence into law first took place in the Majallat al-Aḥkām al-‘Adlīyyah by a group, consisting of seven Islamic scholars, based on Hanafi jurisprudence, in sixteen books and a total of 1851 legal articles. In later modifications to update it, however, the opinions of other denominations were also referred to, and a section on comparative jurisprudence was added.<ref>Ibid, pp. 166-167.</ref> After publication of the Majallat al-Aḥkām al-‘Adlīyyah, it was critiqued and evaluated by scholars of other denominations. One such critique is the book Taḥrīr al-Majallat by Muhammad Hussein Kāshif al-Ghiṭā who was a Shia scholar living in Najaf.<ref>Kāshif al-Ghiṭā, Taḥrīr al-Majallat, vol. 1, pp. 39-40 and 110.</ref> In this book, he explained, criticized and sought to comprehend the al-Majallat and presented the opinions of Shia jurists alongside the opinions of other Islamic denominations in a comparative manner in the framework of new laws. He also added twenty-three jurisprudential rules to the al-Majallat. | Converting Islamic jurisprudence into law first took place in the Majallat al-Aḥkām al-‘Adlīyyah by a group, consisting of seven Islamic scholars, based on Hanafi jurisprudence, in sixteen books and a total of 1851 legal articles. In later modifications to update it, however, the opinions of other denominations were also referred to, and a section on comparative jurisprudence was added.<ref>Ibid, pp. 166-167.</ref> After publication of the Majallat al-Aḥkām al-‘Adlīyyah, it was critiqued and evaluated by scholars of other denominations. One such critique is the book Taḥrīr al-Majallat by Muhammad Hussein Kāshif al-Ghiṭā who was a Shia scholar living in Najaf.<ref>Kāshif al-Ghiṭā, Taḥrīr al-Majallat, vol. 1, pp. 39-40 and 110.</ref> In this book, he explained, criticized and sought to comprehend the al-Majallat and presented the opinions of Shia jurists alongside the opinions of other Islamic denominations in a comparative manner in the framework of new laws. He also added twenty-three jurisprudential rules to the al-Majallat. | ||
== | ==references== | ||
{{references}} | |||
* Abulḥasanī, Mohsen, and Fattāḥī Zafarqandī, Ali, Taqnīn-i Sharī‘at dar Manẓūmi-yi Ḥuqūq-i Asāsī-yi Jumhūrī-yi Islāmī-yi Iran: Mabānī va Rāhkārhā, Tehran, Pijvāk-i ‘Idālat, 2024 | * Abulḥasanī, Mohsen, and Fattāḥī Zafarqandī, Ali, Taqnīn-i Sharī‘at dar Manẓūmi-yi Ḥuqūq-i Asāsī-yi Jumhūrī-yi Islāmī-yi Iran: Mabānī va Rāhkārhā, Tehran, Pijvāk-i ‘Idālat, 2024 | ||
* Idāri-yi Kull-i Umūr-i Farhangī va Ravābit-i ‘Umūmī-yi Majlis-i Shūrā-yi Islāmī, Ṣūrat-i Mashrūḥ-i Muḏākirāt-i Majlis-i Barrisī-yi Nahā’ī-yi Qānūn-i Asāsī-yi Jumhūrī-yi Islāmī-yi Iran, Tehran, Islamic Consultative Assembly publication, 1985 | * Idāri-yi Kull-i Umūr-i Farhangī va Ravābit-i ‘Umūmī-yi Majlis-i Shūrā-yi Islāmī, Ṣūrat-i Mashrūḥ-i Muḏākirāt-i Majlis-i Barrisī-yi Nahā’ī-yi Qānūn-i Asāsī-yi Jumhūrī-yi Islāmī-yi Iran, Tehran, Islamic Consultative Assembly publication, 1985 | ||