Jurisprudence and reason (book)

Line 76:

2. The independent [[use of reason in deriving the rulings of Sharia]]: In this chapter, the [[principle of interdependence]] between the ruling of reason and the ruling of Sharia is described in two chapters; In the first chapter, the [[principle of interdependence at the macro level]] have been proven and the intended meaning of Abolqassem Alidoost has been clarified. On the other hand, in the second chapter, the principle at the micro level has been proposed from two perspectives: one from the perspective of the role of reason in the criteria of Sharia rules, and the second from the perspective of the role of reason in the rules of law and rules of Sharia.

3. Non-independent use of reason: In this chapter, the focus is on the instrumental and non-independent use of reason in three sections: 1. The instrumental use of reason in proving fundamental arguments, interpreting religious evidence, understanding the evidence, forming valid analogies, and examining the documents of narrations, 2. Explaining the application of the [[rational innocence]] and [[rational precaution]], and the explanation of the ruling of reason in events without a ruling and unknown events, while discussing the two theories of ~~"Qubhe Iqabe Bela Bayan"~~ and "Haq Al-Ta'a". 3. The uses of reasoning in inference and ijtihad.

3. Non-independent use of reason: In this chapter, the focus is on the instrumental and non-independent use of reason in three sections: 1. The instrumental use of reason in proving fundamental arguments, interpreting religious evidence, understanding the evidence, forming valid analogies, and examining the documents of narrations, 2. Explaining the application of the [[rational innocence]] and [[rational precaution]], and the explanation of the ruling of reason in events without a ruling and unknown events, while discussing the two theories of the [[repugnance of punishment without warning (qubh al-'iqab bila bayan)]] and "Haq Al-Ta'a". 3. The uses of reasoning in inference and ijtihad.

4. Pathology and answers to doubts and questions: In this chapter, firstly, the harms of using reason in inference are investigated and then the ways to deal with these harms are stated. Then doubts have been expressed in order to question the validity of the perceptions of reason and rational judgments. After this, the relationship between the rule of reason and the building of reason has been discussed.

@@ Line 76: / Line 76: @@
 .  The independent [[use of reason in deriving the rulings of Sharia]]: In this chapter, the [[principle of interdependence]] between the ruling of reason and the ruling of Sharia is described in two chapters; In the first chapter, the [[principle of interdependence at the macro level]] have been proven and the intended meaning of Abolqassem Alidoost has been clarified. On the other hand, in the second chapter, the principle at the micro level has been proposed from two perspectives: one from the perspective of the role of reason in the criteria of Sharia rules, and the second from the perspective of the role of reason in the rules of law and rules of Sharia.
-.  Non-independent use of reason: In this chapter, the focus is on the instrumental and non-independent use of reason in three sections: 1. The instrumental use of reason in proving fundamental arguments, interpreting religious evidence, understanding the evidence, forming valid analogies, and examining the documents of narrations, 2. Explaining the application of the [[rational innocence]] and [[rational precaution]], and the explanation of the ruling of reason in events without a ruling and unknown events, while discussing the two theories of "Qubhe Iqabe Bela Bayan" and "Haq Al-Ta'a". 3. The uses of reasoning in inference and ijtihad.
+.  Non-independent use of reason: In this chapter, the focus is on the instrumental and non-independent use of reason in three sections: 1. The instrumental use of reason in proving fundamental arguments, interpreting religious evidence, understanding the evidence, forming valid analogies, and examining the documents of narrations, 2. Explaining the application of the [[rational innocence]] and [[rational precaution]], and the explanation of the ruling of reason in events without a ruling and unknown events, while discussing the two theories of the [[repugnance of punishment without warning (qubh al-'iqab bila bayan)]] and "Haq Al-Ta'a". 3. The uses of reasoning in inference and ijtihad.
 .  Pathology and answers to doubts and questions: In this chapter, firstly, the harms of using reason in inference are investigated and then the ways to deal with these harms are stated. Then doubts have been expressed in order to question the validity of the perceptions of reason and rational judgments. After this, the relationship between the rule of reason and the building of reason has been discussed.

Jurisprudence and reason (book): Difference between revisions