Jurisprudence and reason (book)

Line 132:

In the fourth and last part of the book, together with the conclusion, it mentions the source of the harms in inference and then the harms of referring to reason and its application in the inference of Sharia rulings. It has been clarified that this process may cause abuse by the enemies of Sharia in the contemporary world and this illusion It showed that the Shari’a was limited to a certain time and place, and as a result, in the present era, the thoughts that fit the conditions of the new age should be replaced with the Sharia. In this regard, while paying attention to the origin of the harms related to the use of reason in inference, Abolqassem Alidoost has also listed examples of these harms.

=== The origin of harms in inference ===

The origin of the harm related to the use of reason in inference is divided into two categories; 1. unnecessary rigidity concerning words, and 2. Intellectualism and ~~lack of devotion~~ (pp. 226-227).

The origin of the harm related to the use of reason in inference is divided into two categories; 1. unnecessary rigidity concerning words, and 2. Intellectualism and disengagement (pp. 226-227).

=== Harms of using reason in deriving rulings ===

In this context, the book mentions three harms that jurists should avoid:

@@ Line 132: / Line 132: @@
 In the fourth and last part of the book, together with the conclusion, it mentions the source of the harms in inference and then the harms of referring to reason and its application in the inference of Sharia rulings. It has been clarified that this process may cause abuse by the enemies of Sharia in the contemporary world and this illusion It showed that the Shari’a was limited to a certain time and place, and as a result, in the present era, the thoughts that fit the conditions of the new age should be replaced with the Sharia. In this regard, while paying attention to the origin of the harms related to the use of reason in inference, Abolqassem Alidoost has also listed examples of these harms.
 === The origin of harms in inference ===
-The origin of the harm related to the use of reason in inference is divided into two categories; 1. unnecessary rigidity concerning words, and 2. Intellectualism and lack of devotion (pp. 226-227).
+The origin of the harm related to the use of reason in inference is divided into two categories; 1. unnecessary rigidity concerning words, and 2. Intellectualism and disengagement (pp. 226-227).
 === Harms of using reason in deriving rulings ===
 In this context, the book mentions three harms that jurists should avoid:

Jurisprudence and reason (book): Difference between revisions