Methods of Artificial Reproduction (book): Difference between revisions

Sarfipour (talk | contribs)
Sarfipour (talk | contribs)
Line 52: Line 52:


=== Claims ===
=== Claims ===
The author is of the opinion that the child born from Artificial Procreation is no different to the child born from natural pregnancy and belongs to the owner of the uterus and the owner of the sperm (p. 417). Also, among the various methods of Artificial Procreation, only in case if the woman’s egg is fertilized with the sperm or stem cell of a Unrelated individual man, the Artificial Procreation is not permissible. From the author's point of view, the only reason that can be cited for the Prohibition of this presumption is the Common Religious Consciousness of Muslims, and other jurisprudential evidence do not indicate its Prohibition (p. 67). It should be mentioned that the effects of a pregnancy resulting from fornication do not apply to illegal Artificial Procreation, and the child resulting from that is considered a legitimate child (p. 14).
The author is of the opinion that the child born from Artificial Procreation is no different to the child born from natural pregnancy and belongs to the owner of the uterus and the owner of the sperm (p. 417). Also, among the various methods of Artificial Procreation, only in case if the woman’s egg is fertilized with the sperm or stem cell of a Unrelated individual man, the Artificial Procreation is not permissible. From the author's point of view, the only reason that can be cited for the Prohibition of this scenario is the Common Religious Consciousness of Muslims, and other jurisprudential evidence do not indicate its Prohibition (p. 67). It should be mentioned that the effects of a pregnancy resulting from fornication do not apply to illegal Artificial Procreation, and the child resulting from that is considered a legitimate child (p. 14).