Methods of Artificial Reproduction (book): Difference between revisions
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
== Artificial Procreation methods == | == Artificial Procreation methods == | ||
The first chapter includes the introduction and three sections. In the introduction, the author investigates legitimate and illegitimate pregnancy and writes that the rulings about an illegitimate child only apply to pregnancy resulting from | The first chapter includes the introduction and three sections. In the introduction, the author investigates legitimate and illegitimate pregnancy and writes that the rulings about an illegitimate child only apply to pregnancy resulting from Coitus between two unmarried people, with knowledge of the absence of a marriage bond, and other forms of illegitimate pregnancy, such as the injection of a Unrelated individual man’s sperm into the womb of a married woman, are not subject to the rulings about a pregnancy resulting from fornication (p. 14). After the introduction, the author has examined the three methods of Artificial Procreation from the perspective of jurisprudence in three sections. | ||
=== Injection of the husband’s sperm === | === Injection of the husband’s sperm === | ||
In this case, if the insemination is accompanied by the consent of both parties, there is no reason for its Prohibition and it is permissible. However, if one of the couples does not consent, neither of them has the right to oblige the other to undergo Artificial Procreation. Nonetheless, if insemination is done, the resulting pregnancy is considered a legitimate pregnancy (pp. 20, 24 and 35). Also, if the husband’s semen is mixed with semen of a Unrelated individual man (to increase the probability of pregnancy), there will be problems about the permissibility of the insemination. The resulting pregnancy, however, will be a legitimate pregnancy (p. 37). Also, insemination with the husband’s sperm is permissible during the Iddah of a revocable divorce or the Iddah of death (pp. 39 and 41). | In this case, if the insemination is accompanied by the consent of both parties, there is no reason for its Prohibition and it is permissible. However, if one of the couples does not consent, neither of them has the right to oblige the other to undergo Artificial Procreation. Nonetheless, if insemination is done, the resulting pregnancy is considered a legitimate pregnancy (pp. 20, 24 and 35). Also, if the husband’s semen is mixed with semen of a Unrelated individual man (to increase the probability of pregnancy), there will be problems about the permissibility of the insemination. The resulting pregnancy, however, will be a legitimate pregnancy (p. 37). Also, insemination with the husband’s sperm is permissible during the Iddah of a revocable divorce or the Iddah of death (pp. 39 and 41). | ||
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
=== Implanting the egg of the owner of the uterus === | === Implanting the egg of the owner of the uterus === | ||
Egg implantation is carried out after in vitro fertilization. Egg fertilization with sperm or stem cell of the husband is permissible only with the consent of both parties, and if one of the spouses does not consent, neither of them has the right to obligate the other. However, if it is done without consent, it is considered a legitimate pregnancy (p. 102). Also, if the sperm or stem cell Affiliated a Unrelated individual man, it goes under the ruling of injecting a Unrelated individual man’s sperm as mentioned above. | Egg implantation is carried out after in vitro fertilization. Egg fertilization with sperm or stem cell of the husband is permissible only with the consent of both parties, and if one of the spouses does not consent, neither of them has the right to obligate the other. However, if it is done without consent, it is considered a legitimate pregnancy (p. 102). Also, if the sperm or stem cell Affiliated a Unrelated individual man, it goes under the ruling of injecting a Unrelated individual man’s sperm as mentioned above. | ||
== Implanting another woman’s egg == | == Implanting another woman’s egg == | ||
In this assumption, if the consent of the owner of the egg, the owner of the uterus and her husband is obtained, implantation of the egg is permissible. Also, consent of the egg owner's spouse is not necessary unless we assume that the lineage of the child Affiliated the egg owner or that the egg donation is against his rights, in which case his consent is also required (p. 114). | In this assumption, if the consent of the owner of the egg, the owner of the uterus and her husband is obtained, implantation of the egg is permissible. Also, consent of the egg owner's spouse is not necessary unless we assume that the lineage of the child Affiliated the egg owner or that the egg donation is against his rights, in which case his consent is also required (p. 114). | ||