Methods of Artificial Reproduction (book): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
== Implanting another woman’s egg == | == Implanting another woman’s egg == | ||
In this scenario, if the consent of the | In this scenario, if the consent of the Egg donor, the owner of the uterus and her husband is obtained, implantation of the egg is permissible. Also, consent of the egg owner's spouse is not necessary unless we assume that the lineage of the child Affiliated the egg owner or that the egg donation is against his rights, in which case his consent is also required (p. 114). | ||
=== Genital organ implants === | === Genital organ implants === | ||
According to the author, implantation of sex organs does not cause problems for subsequent pregnancies from the jurisprudential point of view, and if pregnancy occurs after the implantation of genital organs, it is considered a legitimate pregnancy. This ruling is not specific to men or women and includes the implantation of genitals in the body of both (p. 133). | According to the author, implantation of sex organs does not cause problems for subsequent pregnancies from the jurisprudential point of view, and if pregnancy occurs after the implantation of genital organs, it is considered a legitimate pregnancy. This ruling is not specific to men or women and includes the implantation of genitals in the body of both (p. 133). | ||
| Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
Regarding paternal lineage, Sayyid Mohsen Hakim is of the opinion that from the jurisprudential point of view, the child resulting from Artificial Procreation does not belong to the owner of the sperm, but only Affiliated the mother (p. 412). But from the author’s point of view, this statement and its reasons can be criticized, and the child resulting from Artificial Procreation takes its paternal lineage from the owner of the sperm or stem cell by which the egg was fertilized (pp. 417 and 421). Regarding attribution to the mother, according to custom and lexicology, the title of mother refers to the owner of the womb who gives birth to the child (p. 440). From the jurisprudential point of view as well, the strongest possibility is attribution of the child to the owner of the womb (p. 450). In any case, if parentage of the child is not known, from the point of view of jurisprudence, adoption is invalid and is not affected by the religious effects and requirements of parent and child (p. 466). | Regarding paternal lineage, Sayyid Mohsen Hakim is of the opinion that from the jurisprudential point of view, the child resulting from Artificial Procreation does not belong to the owner of the sperm, but only Affiliated the mother (p. 412). But from the author’s point of view, this statement and its reasons can be criticized, and the child resulting from Artificial Procreation takes its paternal lineage from the owner of the sperm or stem cell by which the egg was fertilized (pp. 417 and 421). Regarding attribution to the mother, according to custom and lexicology, the title of mother refers to the owner of the womb who gives birth to the child (p. 440). From the jurisprudential point of view as well, the strongest possibility is attribution of the child to the owner of the womb (p. 450). In any case, if parentage of the child is not known, from the point of view of jurisprudence, adoption is invalid and is not affected by the religious effects and requirements of parent and child (p. 466). | ||
=== Inheritance and rules of fostering === | === Inheritance and rules of fostering === | ||
In pregnancies resulting from various methods of Artificial Procreation, the author believes that if the child takes lineage from the living parent, the rules of inheritance will apply, but if Artificial Procreation is done after the death of the mother or father, the child resulting from Artificial Procreation will not inherit from them (pp. 468 and 472). Also, comparing fostering to Artificial Procreation is not correct, and if we consider the | In pregnancies resulting from various methods of Artificial Procreation, the author believes that if the child takes lineage from the living parent, the rules of inheritance will apply, but if Artificial Procreation is done after the death of the mother or father, the child resulting from Artificial Procreation will not inherit from them (pp. 468 and 472). Also, comparing fostering to Artificial Procreation is not correct, and if we consider the Egg donor as the child’s mother, the owner of the womb has no relationship with the child from the religious point of view, and the rulings related to fostering, such as the Prohibition of marriage, do not apply between the owner of the womb and the child born by Artificial Procreation (p. 481). | ||
=== Abortion === | === Abortion === | ||
Abortion is forbidden in any case and there is no difference between a fetus resulting from Artificial Procreation and a fetus resulting from natural pregnancy. Even if we consider the mother to be the | Abortion is forbidden in any case and there is no difference between a fetus resulting from Artificial Procreation and a fetus resulting from natural pregnancy. Even if we consider the mother to be the Egg donor, abortion is forbidden for the owner of the womb as well. However, if avoiding abortion leads to severe hardship and trouble, abortion is permissible until before the soul is blown into the body (pp. 483-484). | ||
[[fa:وسائل الانجاب الصناعیة (کتاب)]] | [[fa:وسائل الانجاب الصناعیة (کتاب)]] | ||
[[Category:Bibliography Articles]] | [[Category:Bibliography Articles]] | ||
[[Category:Books by Mohammad Reza Sistani]] | [[Category:Books by Mohammad Reza Sistani]] | ||
[[Category:Books on Artificial Insemination]] | [[Category:Books on Artificial Insemination]] | ||