Jurisprudence of treatment (book): Difference between revisions
| Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
In the second chapter, Muhammad-Ali Qāsimī discusses the jurisprudential ruling on medical examinations in the treatment process within four statements. In the first statement, competence of the The Attending Physician, the incompetent doctor and examination by students have been investigated. In the second statement, issues such as the doctor’s looking at the body of a patient of the opposite sex, looking at the private parts of other people and touching the body of a non-mahram person by the doctor have been discussed under the title of heterogeneity of the sexes of the doctor and the patient in examination and treatment. The third statement of this chapter deals with the role of the patient’s or his guardian’s permission in the examination and treatment process. and the fourth statement explains the position of medical examinations in proving crimes. This chapter ends with an appendix containing the fatwas of jurists about the doctor, the treatment team and the patient being of the same or different gender. | In the second chapter, Muhammad-Ali Qāsimī discusses the jurisprudential ruling on medical examinations in the treatment process within four statements. In the first statement, competence of the The Attending Physician, the incompetent doctor and examination by students have been investigated. In the second statement, issues such as the doctor’s looking at the body of a patient of the opposite sex, looking at the private parts of other people and touching the body of a non-mahram person by the doctor have been discussed under the title of heterogeneity of the sexes of the doctor and the patient in examination and treatment. The third statement of this chapter deals with the role of the patient’s or his guardian’s permission in the examination and treatment process. and the fourth statement explains the position of medical examinations in proving crimes. This chapter ends with an appendix containing the fatwas of jurists about the doctor, the treatment team and the patient being of the same or different gender. | ||
=== Jurisprudential-legal examination of treatment === | === Jurisprudential-legal examination of treatment === | ||
In the third chapter, the legitimacy of treatment, cases of obligation of treatment, doctors’ Civil Liability, responsibilities of competent and incompetent doctors, the verdict for the doctor who refrains from treatment as well as aiding the injured have been explained under the statement on the jurisprudential ruling on treatment. In the second statement, Therapeutics involving Proscribed Substances and committing impermissible actions have been investigated; | In the third chapter, the legitimacy of treatment, cases of obligation of treatment, doctors’ Civil Liability, responsibilities of competent and incompetent doctors, the verdict for the doctor who refrains from treatment as well as aiding the injured have been explained under the statement on the jurisprudential ruling on treatment. In the second statement, Therapeutics involving Proscribed Substances and committing impermissible actions have been investigated; Abrogation of Prohibition because of State of Necessity (Darurah), treatment with Inebriants, [[Narcotics|narcotics]] and [[Psychotropic drugs|psychotropic drugs]], jurisprudential ruling on [[Cosmetic surgery]], [[Energy therapy|energy therapy]] and [[Hypnosis|hypnosis]] are among the topics discussed in this section. The ideas of jurists and their responses to questions about treatment, various kinds of informed consent obtained from patients and the fatwas of jurists about energy therapy are among the appendices of this chapter. | ||
=== Doctors’ and Medical Personnel’s fees === | === Doctors’ and Medical Personnel’s fees === | ||