Jurisprudence of treatment (book)

Line 101:

== Review and evaluation ==

Redundancy is one of the criticisms directed at the book Fiqh-i Darmān. In this book, written in Persian language, when referring to verses or hadiths, both the Arabic text and the Persian translation are mentioned consecutively, which has ~~increased the volume~~ of the book. This problem is more observable when the text of verses or hadiths is long (p. 98). Excessive lexical discussions and searches for the roots of words are other examples of Redundancy. For example, in examining the concept of patient’s consent, the author has dedicated several pages of the book to the study of the concept of consent and the Sections of human beings over themselves (pp. 107-123). The consecutive mention of the common fatwas of jurists is another example of Redundancy in this book (pp. 371-372). The author has mentioned the text of several common fatwas in the appendices of the book and sometimes in the main text, while the brief mention of the sense of the fatwas could suffice.

Redundancy is one of the criticisms directed at the book Fiqh-i Darmān. In this book, written in Persian language, when referring to verses or hadiths, both the Arabic text and the Persian translation are mentioned consecutively, which has Unnecessary Expansion of Volume of the book. This problem is more observable when the text of verses or hadiths is long (p. 98). Excessive lexical discussions and searches for the roots of words are other examples of Redundancy. For example, in examining the concept of patient’s consent, the author has dedicated several pages of the book to the study of the concept of consent and the Sections of human beings over themselves (pp. 107-123). The consecutive mention of the common fatwas of jurists is another example of Redundancy in this book (pp. 371-372). The author has mentioned the text of several common fatwas in the appendices of the book and sometimes in the main text, while the brief mention of the sense of the fatwas could suffice.

Among other criticisms of this book is that it quotes some sayings without providing reference to a specific source. In these cases, the author considers an idea as a basis and rejects or strengthens it without documenting it (p. 82).

== References ==

@@ Line 101: / Line 101: @@
 == Review and evaluation ==
-Redundancy is one of the criticisms directed at the book Fiqh-i Darmān. In this book, written in Persian language, when referring to verses or hadiths, both the Arabic text and the Persian translation are mentioned consecutively, which has increased the volume of the book. This problem is more observable when the text of verses or hadiths is long (p. 98). Excessive lexical discussions and searches for the roots of words are other examples of Redundancy. For example, in examining the concept of patient’s consent, the author has dedicated several pages of the book to the study of the concept of consent and the Sections of human beings over themselves (pp. 107-123). The consecutive mention of the common fatwas of jurists is another example of Redundancy in this book (pp. 371-372). The author has mentioned the text of several common fatwas in the appendices of the book and sometimes in the main text, while the brief mention of the sense of the fatwas could suffice.
+Redundancy is one of the criticisms directed at the book Fiqh-i Darmān. In this book, written in Persian language, when referring to verses or hadiths, both the Arabic text and the Persian translation are mentioned consecutively, which has Unnecessary Expansion of Volume of the book. This problem is more observable when the text of verses or hadiths is long (p. 98). Excessive lexical discussions and searches for the roots of words are other examples of Redundancy. For example, in examining the concept of patient’s consent, the author has dedicated several pages of the book to the study of the concept of consent and the Sections of human beings over themselves (pp. 107-123). The consecutive mention of the common fatwas of jurists is another example of Redundancy in this book (pp. 371-372). The author has mentioned the text of several common fatwas in the appendices of the book and sometimes in the main text, while the brief mention of the sense of the fatwas could suffice.
 Among other criticisms of this book is that it quotes some sayings without providing reference to a specific source. In these cases, the author considers an idea as a basis and rejects or strengthens it without documenting it (p. 82).
 == References ==

Jurisprudence of treatment (book): Difference between revisions