Jurisprudence of treatment (book)

Line 102:

== Review and evaluation ==

Redundancy is one of the criticisms directed at the book Fiqh-i Darmān. In this book, written in Persian language, when referring to verses or hadiths, both the Arabic text and the Persian translation are mentioned consecutively, which has Unnecessary Expansion of Volume of the book. This problem is more observable when the text of verses or hadiths is long (p. 98). Excessive Etymological and Lexical Analysis and searches for the roots of words are other examples of Redundancy. For example, in examining the concept of patient’s consent, the author has dedicated several pages of the book to the study of the concept of consent and the Individual Autonomy (pp. 107-123). The consecutive mention of the Established Fatwas of jurists is another example of Redundancy in this book (pp. 371-372). The author has mentioned the text of several Established Fatwas in the appendices of the book and sometimes in the main text, while the Succinct Synthesis of the fatwas could suffice.

Among other criticisms of this book is that it quotes some sayings without Bibliographic Documentation to a specific source. In these cases, the author considers an idea as a basis and rejects or strengthens it without ~~documenting it~~ (p. 82).

Among other criticisms of this book is that it quotes some sayings without Bibliographic Documentation to a specific source. In these cases, the author considers an idea as a basis and rejects or strengthens it without Substantiating the Claims (p. 82).

== References ==

@@ Line 102: / Line 102: @@
 == Review and evaluation ==
 Redundancy is one of the criticisms directed at the book Fiqh-i Darmān. In this book, written in Persian language, when referring to verses or hadiths, both the Arabic text and the Persian translation are mentioned consecutively, which has Unnecessary Expansion of Volume of the book. This problem is more observable when the text of verses or hadiths is long (p. 98). Excessive Etymological and Lexical Analysis and searches for the roots of words are other examples of Redundancy. For example, in examining the concept of patient’s consent, the author has dedicated several pages of the book to the study of the concept of consent and the Individual Autonomy (pp. 107-123). The consecutive mention of the Established Fatwas of jurists is another example of Redundancy in this book (pp. 371-372). The author has mentioned the text of several Established Fatwas in the appendices of the book and sometimes in the main text, while the Succinct Synthesis of the fatwas could suffice.
-Among other criticisms of this book is that it quotes some sayings without  Bibliographic Documentation to a specific source. In these cases, the author considers an idea as a basis and rejects or strengthens it without documenting it (p. 82).
+Among other criticisms of this book is that it quotes some sayings without  Bibliographic Documentation to a specific source. In these cases, the author considers an idea as a basis and rejects or strengthens it without Substantiating the Claims (p. 82).
 == References ==
 {{References}}

Jurisprudence of treatment (book): Difference between revisions