Jurisprudence of treatment (book): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
In the second chapter, Muhammad-Ali Qāsimī discusses the jurisprudential ruling on medical examinations in the treatment process within four statements. In the first statement, competence of the examining doctor, the incompetent doctor and examination by students have been investigated. In the second statement, issues such as the doctor’s looking at the body of a patient of the opposite sex, looking at the private parts of other people and touching the body of a non-mahram person by the doctor have been discussed under the title of heterogeneity of the sexes of the doctor and the patient in examination and treatment. The third statement of this chapter deals with the role of the patient’s or his guardian’s permission in the examination and treatment process. and the fourth statement explains the position of medical examinations in proving crimes. This chapter ends with an appendix containing the fatwas of jurists about the doctor, the treatment team and the patient being of the same or different gender. | In the second chapter, Muhammad-Ali Qāsimī discusses the jurisprudential ruling on medical examinations in the treatment process within four statements. In the first statement, competence of the examining doctor, the incompetent doctor and examination by students have been investigated. In the second statement, issues such as the doctor’s looking at the body of a patient of the opposite sex, looking at the private parts of other people and touching the body of a non-mahram person by the doctor have been discussed under the title of heterogeneity of the sexes of the doctor and the patient in examination and treatment. The third statement of this chapter deals with the role of the patient’s or his guardian’s permission in the examination and treatment process. and the fourth statement explains the position of medical examinations in proving crimes. This chapter ends with an appendix containing the fatwas of jurists about the doctor, the treatment team and the patient being of the same or different gender. | ||
=== Jurisprudential-legal examination of treatment === | === Jurisprudential-legal examination of treatment === | ||
In the third chapter, the legitimacy of treatment, cases of obligation of treatment, doctors’ civil responsibility, responsibilities of competent and incompetent doctors, the verdict for the doctor who refrains from treatment as well as aiding the injured have been explained under the statement on the jurisprudential ruling on treatment. In the second statement, treatment with forbidden items and committing impermissible actions have been investigated; annulling forbiddance because of urgency, treatment with intoxicants, [[Narcotics|narcotics]] and [[Psychotropic drugs|psychotropic drugs]], jurisprudential ruling on [[ | In the third chapter, the legitimacy of treatment, cases of obligation of treatment, doctors’ civil responsibility, responsibilities of competent and incompetent doctors, the verdict for the doctor who refrains from treatment as well as aiding the injured have been explained under the statement on the jurisprudential ruling on treatment. In the second statement, treatment with forbidden items and committing impermissible actions have been investigated; annulling forbiddance because of urgency, treatment with intoxicants, [[Narcotics|narcotics]] and [[Psychotropic drugs|psychotropic drugs]], jurisprudential ruling on [[Cosmetic surgery]], [[Energy therapy|energy therapy]] and [[Hypnosis|hypnosis]] are among the topics discussed in this section. The ideas of jurists and their responses to questions about treatment, various kinds of informed consent obtained from patients and the fatwas of jurists about energy therapy are among the appendices of this chapter. | ||
=== Doctors’ and treatment staff’s fees === | === Doctors’ and treatment staff’s fees === | ||
The final chapter of the book discusses various types of payments to doctors either from the public treasury or by the patient under the topic of doctors’ fees, and investigates the issue of receiving fees for performing obligatory duties, including the practice of medicine. The second statement of this chapter deals with receiving bribe and the reasons for its forbiddance (obtaining property from unlawful ways and breaking one’s oath). The appendix of the fourth chapter presents a collection of the ideas of jurists about doctors’ fees and bribery. | The final chapter of the book discusses various types of payments to doctors either from the public treasury or by the patient under the topic of doctors’ fees, and investigates the issue of receiving fees for performing obligatory duties, including the practice of medicine. The second statement of this chapter deals with receiving bribe and the reasons for its forbiddance (obtaining property from unlawful ways and breaking one’s oath). The appendix of the fourth chapter presents a collection of the ideas of jurists about doctors’ fees and bribery. | ||