Jurisprudence and Law (book): Difference between revisions
| Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
===Solving the problem of law and jurisprudence=== | ===Solving the problem of law and jurisprudence=== | ||
[[Seyfullah Sorami|Saifullah Sarami]], a faculty member of the scientific [[Research Institute of Islamic Sciences and Culture]], believes that in the [[Islamic government]] and in the legislative process, the issue of | [[Seyfullah Sorami|Saifullah Sarami]], a faculty member of the scientific [[Research Institute of Islamic Sciences and Culture]], believes that in the [[Islamic government]] and in the legislative process, the issue of jurisprudence and law has a fundamental problem. Because jurisprudential rulings have characteristics such as devotion and stability, and it is in contrast to law, it is temporary and can be revoked according to the conditions and requirements of time and place (p. 607). Accordingly, in order to solve this problem, we should go back to before the law was approved, explaining that we are faced with interests and interests at the legislative stage. On the other hand, securing the hereafter and worldly happiness of mankind depends on the compliance with the demands of [[Sharia]]. Now, if we can create a logical and valid combination between the purposes of [[legislation]] and the demands of Sharia law before approving the law, the approved law will also be the sum of them. In addition, the problem of the relationship between jurisprudence and the law will be solved before it arises so the approved law will be the answer. It is according to the demands of Islam and also responds to the needs of time and place (p. 623-624). | ||
===Legislation in the Permissible Zone=== | ===Legislation in the Permissible Zone=== | ||