Customary legislation

Line 24:

===Muslims do not need new laws===

According to [[Mohammad Hossein Tabrizi|Mohammad Hussein Tabrīzī]], an Iranian [[jurist]] during [[Iranian Constitutional Era|Iran’s constitutional era]], the existence of the [[divine comprehensive law]] is enough to organize the lives of people, and it leaves no need for a new law. In upcoming issues, people should refer to religious scholars based on the provisions of [[Imam al-Mahdi (AS)|Imam al-Mahdī’s (AS)]] decree<ref name="ref9">Tabrīzī, Kashf al-Murād, p. 131</ref>. Marandī Najafī, another [[jurist]] in the constitutional era, believed that considering the abolition of past religions by Islam, and based on the ~~اکمال دین verse (~~[[~~Surah Al-Ma'idah|verse~~ 3 ~~of surah al-Mā’idah~~]] about the completion of religion), there will be no need for the enactment of new laws and anyone who believes otherwise, in fact, denies God and the [[Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)|Prophet (PBUH)]]<ref name="ref10">Najafī Marandī, Dalā’il Barāhīn al-Furqān, pp. 197-200</ref>. Also, [[Sayyid Javad Varai|Sayyid Javād Vara‘ī]] has said that after the victory of the [[Islamic Revolution of Iran]], some [[jurists]] considered lawmaking as deception and standing against the [[Qur'an]]. They believed that the [[Qur'an]] and the [[Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)|Prophet’s]] conduct make our [[Constitution]] and that there is no need for new laws<ref name="ref11">Vara‘ī, Nisbat-i Fiqh va Qānūn dar Nigāh-i ‘Alimān-i Dīn, pp. 57-59</ref>.

According to [[Mohammad Hossein Tabrizi|Mohammad Hussein Tabrīzī]], an Iranian [[jurist]] during [[Iranian Constitutional Era|Iran’s constitutional era]], the existence of the [[divine comprehensive law]] is enough to organize the lives of people, and it leaves no need for a new law. In upcoming issues, people should refer to religious scholars based on the provisions of [[Imam al-Mahdi (AS)|Imam al-Mahdī’s (AS)]] decree<ref name="ref9">Tabrīzī, Kashf al-Murād, p. 131</ref>. Marandī Najafī, another [[jurist]] in the constitutional era, believed that considering the abolition of past religions by Islam, and based on the [[Quran 5:3]] about the completion of religion), there will be no need for the enactment of new laws and anyone who believes otherwise, in fact, denies God and the [[Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)|Prophet (PBUH)]]<ref name="ref10">Najafī Marandī, Dalā’il Barāhīn al-Furqān, pp. 197-200</ref>. Also, [[Sayyid Javad Varai|Sayyid Javād Vara‘ī]] has said that after the victory of the [[Islamic Revolution of Iran]], some [[jurists]] considered lawmaking as deception and standing against the [[Qur'an]]. They believed that the [[Qur'an]] and the [[Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)|Prophet’s]] conduct make our [[Constitution]] and that there is no need for new laws<ref name="ref11">Vara‘ī, Nisbat-i Fiqh va Qānūn dar Nigāh-i ‘Alimān-i Dīn, pp. 57-59</ref>.

===Contradiction of legislation with the Prophet’s (PBUH) prophethood and finality===

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 ===Muslims do not need new laws===
-According to [[Mohammad Hossein Tabrizi|Mohammad Hussein Tabrīzī]], an Iranian [[jurist]] during [[Iranian Constitutional Era|Iran’s constitutional era]], the existence of the [[divine comprehensive law]] is enough to organize the lives of people, and it leaves no need for a new law. In upcoming issues, people should refer to religious scholars based on the provisions of [[Imam al-Mahdi (AS)|Imam al-Mahdī’s (AS)]] decree<ref name="ref9">Tabrīzī, Kashf al-Murād, p. 131</ref>. Marandī Najafī, another [[jurist]] in the constitutional era, believed that considering the abolition of past religions by Islam, and based on the اکمال دین verse ([[Surah Al-Ma'idah|verse 3 of surah al-Mā’idah]] about the completion of religion), there will be no need for the enactment of new laws and anyone who believes otherwise, in fact, denies God and the [[Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)|Prophet (PBUH)]]<ref name="ref10">Najafī Marandī, Dalā’il Barāhīn al-Furqān, pp. 197-200</ref>. Also, [[Sayyid Javad Varai|Sayyid Javād Vara‘ī]] has said that after the victory of the [[Islamic Revolution of Iran]], some [[jurists]] considered lawmaking as deception and standing against the [[Qur'an]]. They believed that the [[Qur'an]] and the [[Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)|Prophet’s]] conduct make our [[Constitution]] and that there is no need for new laws<ref name="ref11">Vara‘ī, Nisbat-i Fiqh va Qānūn dar Nigāh-i ‘Alimān-i Dīn, pp. 57-59</ref>.
+According to [[Mohammad Hossein Tabrizi|Mohammad Hussein Tabrīzī]], an Iranian [[jurist]] during [[Iranian Constitutional Era|Iran’s constitutional era]], the existence of the [[divine comprehensive law]] is enough to organize the lives of people, and it leaves no need for a new law. In upcoming issues, people should refer to religious scholars based on the provisions of [[Imam al-Mahdi (AS)|Imam al-Mahdī’s (AS)]] decree<ref name="ref9">Tabrīzī, Kashf al-Murād, p. 131</ref>. Marandī Najafī, another [[jurist]] in the constitutional era, believed that considering the abolition of past religions by Islam, and based on the [[Quran 5:3]] about the completion of religion), there will be no need for the enactment of new laws and anyone who believes otherwise, in fact, denies God and the [[Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)|Prophet (PBUH)]]<ref name="ref10">Najafī Marandī, Dalā’il Barāhīn al-Furqān, pp. 197-200</ref>. Also, [[Sayyid Javad Varai|Sayyid Javād Vara‘ī]] has said that after the victory of the [[Islamic Revolution of Iran]], some [[jurists]] considered lawmaking as deception and standing against the [[Qur'an]]. They believed that the [[Qur'an]] and the [[Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)|Prophet’s]] conduct make our [[Constitution]] and that there is no need for new laws<ref name="ref11">Vara‘ī, Nisbat-i Fiqh va Qānūn dar Nigāh-i ‘Alimān-i Dīn, pp. 57-59</ref>.
 ===Contradiction of legislation with the Prophet’s (PBUH) prophethood and finality===

Customary legislation: Difference between revisions