Sculpture: Difference between revisions

Sarfipour (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Sarfipour (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 43: Line 43:


==== Consensus Among Jurists and its Critique ====
==== Consensus Among Jurists and its Critique ====
There has not been a consensus among jurists regarding the prohibition of sculpture. However, according to Hossein Ali Montazeri, the first person to claim consensus on this issue was [[Mohaqqeq Karaki]]<ref>Muhaqqeq Karaki, Jame' al-Maqasid, Vol. 4, p. 23.</ref> and no previous jurists have claimed consensus on this matter. This purported consensus has been criticized by jurists such as Sayyid Taqi Tabatabai Qomi and Hossein Ali Montazeri. They argue that this consensus is not a clear or probable proof and believe that there are numerous narrations, transmitted through both Shia and Sunni sources, which may provide plausible evidence for the permissibility of sculpture creation. Hence, they contend that consensus is not an independent proof for this matter.
There has not been a consensus among jurists regarding the prohibition of sculpture. However, according to Hossein Ali Montazeri, the first person to claim consensus on this issue was [[Mohaqqeq Karaki]]<ref>Muhaqqeq Karaki, Jame' al-Maqasid, Vol. 4, p. 23.</ref> and no previous jurists have claimed consensus on this matter. This purported consensus has been criticized by jurists such as [[Sayyid Taqi Tabatabaei Qomi]] and Hossein Ali Montazeri. They argue that this consensus is not a clear or probable proof and believe that there are numerous narrations, transmitted through both Shia and Sunni sources, which may provide plausible evidence for the permissibility of sculpture creation. Hence, they contend that consensus is not an independent proof for this matter.
There is no consensus among jurists regarding the prohibition of sculpture. Sayyid Taqi Tabatabai Qomi and Hossein-Ali Montazeri criticized the alleged consensus, claiming it to be a consensus with known origins<ref>Ijma’ al Madraki is a type of consensus whose origins are currently available in other jurisprudential sources i.e. Qur'an and Prophetic narrations.</ref>  or probable evidence and believe that there is a likelihood that the evidence for the jurists' verdict on the prohibition of sculpture comes from numerous narrations in both Shia and Sunni sources. Therefore, they believe that this consensus does not qualify as an independent proof for this matter<ref>Montazeri, Darasat Fi al-Makasib al-Muharammah, Vol. 2, p. 557.</ref>.  
There is no consensus among jurists regarding the prohibition of sculpture. Sayyid Taqi Tabatabaei Qomi and Hossein-Ali Montazeri criticized the alleged consensus, claiming it to be a consensus with known origins<ref>Ijma’ al Madraki is a type of consensus whose origins are currently available in other jurisprudential sources i.e. Qur'an and Prophetic narrations.</ref>  or probable evidence and believe that there is a likelihood that the evidence for the jurists' verdict on the prohibition of sculpture comes from numerous narrations in both Shia and Sunni sources. Therefore, they believe that this consensus does not qualify as an independent proof for this matter<ref>Montazeri, Darasat Fi al-Makasib al-Muharammah, Vol. 2, p. 557.</ref>.  


=== Exceptions to the Prohibition ===
=== Exceptions to the Prohibition ===