State theories in Shiite jurisprudence (book): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
According to him, the development of [[Shiite political theory]] began with the recognition of Shiism in the Safavid era and the relative empowerment of jurists in the Qajar era, with the works of jurists such as [[Mohaqqeq Karaki]] and [[Mulla Ahmad Naraqi]]. He asserted that during this period we witnessed the formation of the theory of appointment, and then, the theory of selection also grew in the Constitutional era (Mashruteh) and the Islamic Republic. | According to him, the development of [[Shiite political theory]] began with the recognition of Shiism in the Safavid era and the relative empowerment of jurists in the Qajar era, with the works of jurists such as [[Mohaqqeq Karaki]] and [[Mulla Ahmad Naraqi]]. He asserted that during this period we witnessed the formation of the theory of appointment, and then, the theory of selection also grew in the Constitutional era (Mashruteh) and the Islamic Republic. | ||
The book of State Theories in Shiite jurisprudence was reviewed and criticized by critics after its publication. The lack of comprehensiveness, lack of analysis, and lack of attention to the common positions of jurists regarding the guardianship of the Islamic jurist are among the criticisms that have been made to this book. In contrast to proper collection, documentation and fluent | The book of State Theories in Shiite jurisprudence was reviewed and criticized by critics after its publication. The lack of comprehensiveness, lack of analysis, and lack of attention to the common positions of jurists regarding the guardianship of the Islamic jurist are among the criticisms that have been made to this book. In contrast to proper collection, documentation and fluent prose are among its advantages. | ||
== Introduction == | == Introduction == | ||