State theories in Shiite jurisprudence (book): Difference between revisions
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
== Appointment theories == | == Appointment theories == | ||
After the introduction, the author introduced nine | After the introduction, the author introduced nine derived opinions. He has included four theories of [[Legitimate monarchy|legitimate monarchy]], [[The public appointment of jurists|the public appointment of jurists]], [[The public appointment of the Council of religious authorities|the public appointment of the Council of religious authorities]] and [[The absolute appointment of jurists|the absolute appointment of jurists]] under the theories of appointment. Under each theory, he examines the principles, foundations and interpretations of each of these issues. | ||
=== The Principles of appointment theories === | === The Principles of appointment theories === | ||
According to the author, appointment theories, apart from the theory of legitimate monarchy, have several principles in common: | According to the author, appointment theories, apart from the theory of legitimate monarchy, have several principles in common: | ||
| Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
=== Functional duality in the theory of legitimate monarchy === | === Functional duality in the theory of legitimate monarchy === | ||
Legitimate monarchy is one of the other theories of appointment, according to the author, it is one of the few theories in Shiite political jurisprudence that has been experienced in practice and has been governing the political practice of Shiites for a long time. (p. 58) This theory has two principles: one; The appointment of jurisprudents in non-litigious matters (al-omour al-hesbiah), such as decree and propagation of religious rules, enforcement of limits, administration of endowments, etc., which is also interpreted as Sharia. The king has power in this area with conditions such as Islam, Shiism, and having jurist (wali al-faqih). Of course, according to him, this separation was due to the imposing the conditions of the time, and the jurists were forced to be satisfied with this amount of jurist (wali al-faqih) (pp. 59-60). Five interpretations of this theory are presented by Allameh Majlesi, Mirzaye Qomi, Seyyed Jafar Kashafi, Fazolollah Nouri, and Abd Al-Karim Haeri Yazdi and Mohammad Ali Araki (p. 61-79). | Legitimate monarchy is one of the other theories of appointment, according to the author, it is one of the few theories in Shiite political jurisprudence that has been experienced in practice and has been governing the political practice of Shiites for a long time. (p. 58) This theory has two principles: one; The appointment of jurisprudents in non-litigious matters (al-omour al-hesbiah), such as decree and propagation of religious rules, enforcement of limits, administration of endowments, etc., which is also interpreted as Sharia. The king has power in this area with conditions such as Islam, Shiism, and having jurist (wali al-faqih). Of course, according to him, this separation was due to the imposing the conditions of the time, and the jurists were forced to be satisfied with this amount of jurist (wali al-faqih) (pp. 59-60). Five interpretations of this theory are presented by Allameh Majlesi, Mirzaye Qomi, Seyyed Jafar Kashafi, Fazolollah Nouri, and Abd Al-Karim Haeri Yazdi and Mohammad Ali Araki (p. 61-79). | ||
== Selection theories == | == Selection theories == | ||
[[The constitutional-legitimate state]], [[The caliphate of the people under the supervision of the authority|the caliphate of the people under the supervision of the jurist (wali al-faqih)]], [[The elected governorship of the jurist|the elected Guardianship (Wilayah) of the jurist]], [[The Islamic elected state|the Islamic elected state]] and [[The representation of the common private owners|the representation of the common private owners]] are the five theories that Mohsen Kadivar examined under the tile of selection theories. According to him, the theories of choice have several common features, the most important of which is increasing the role of the people in the state and reducing the powers of the jurists. Of course, each of the five theories has a special feature that is referred to. | [[The constitutional-legitimate state]], [[The caliphate of the people under the supervision of the authority|the caliphate of the people under the supervision of the jurist (wali al-faqih)]], [[The elected governorship of the jurist|the elected Guardianship (Wilayah) of the jurist]], [[The Islamic elected state|the Islamic elected state]] and [[The representation of the common private owners|the representation of the common private owners]] are the five theories that Mohsen Kadivar examined under the tile of selection theories. According to him, the theories of choice have several common features, the most important of which is increasing the role of the people in the state and reducing the powers of the jurists. Of course, each of the five theories has a special feature that is referred to. | ||