Jurisprudence of treatment (book): Difference between revisions
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
== Organization of the book == | == Organization of the book == | ||
Fiqh-i Darmān has been compiled in four chapters, several statements and a few appendices. In the first chapter of the book, the author has explained the | Fiqh-i Darmān has been compiled in four chapters, several statements and a few appendices. In the first chapter of the book, the author has explained the Theoretical Framework of the research (explaining the problem, background, necessity, method and research questions) and examined terms such as treatment, examination and screening | ||
=== Jurisprudential ruling on medical examination === | === Jurisprudential ruling on medical examination === | ||
In the second chapter, Muhammad-Ali Qāsimī discusses the jurisprudential ruling on medical examinations in the treatment process within four statements. In the first statement, competence of the The Attending Physician, the incompetent doctor and examination by students have been investigated. In the second statement, issues such as the doctor’s looking at the body of a patient of the opposite sex, looking at the private parts of other people and touching the body of a non-mahram person by the doctor have been discussed under the title of heterogeneity of the sexes of the doctor and the patient in examination and treatment. The third statement of this chapter deals with the role of the patient’s or his guardian’s permission in the examination and treatment process. and the fourth statement explains the position of medical examinations in proving crimes. This chapter ends with an appendix containing the fatwas of jurists about the doctor, the treatment team and the patient being of the same or different gender. | In the second chapter, Muhammad-Ali Qāsimī discusses the jurisprudential ruling on medical examinations in the treatment process within four statements. In the first statement, competence of the The Attending Physician, the incompetent doctor and examination by students have been investigated. In the second statement, issues such as the doctor’s looking at the body of a patient of the opposite sex, looking at the private parts of other people and touching the body of a non-mahram person by the doctor have been discussed under the title of heterogeneity of the sexes of the doctor and the patient in examination and treatment. The third statement of this chapter deals with the role of the patient’s or his guardian’s permission in the examination and treatment process. and the fourth statement explains the position of medical examinations in proving crimes. This chapter ends with an appendix containing the fatwas of jurists about the doctor, the treatment team and the patient being of the same or different gender. | ||