Jurisprudence of treatment (book)

Line 48:

* '''Abstract'''

Jurisprudence of Treatment (in persian: [https://ency.feqhemoaser.com/fa/view/%D9%81%D9%82%D9%87_%D8%AF%D8%B1%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%86_(%DA%A9%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%A8) فقه درمان]) is a book in the field of [[Medical jurisprudence|medical jurisprudence]], authored by [[Muhammad-Ali Qāsimī]], that discusses the Jurisprudential Precepts of medical examination and treatment in four chapters and several statements. This book discusses topics such as the The Attending Physician’s Professional Qualification and lack of Professional Qualification, conditions for the permission of the doctor to look at the body of a patient of the Non-mahram and touch it, cases where it is necessary to obtain the permission of the patient or their guardian for examination and treatment, the role of medical examinations in proving crimes, whether the doctor is or is not to be held responsible if the patient has not signed an Informed Consent, the conditions for permission to treat with Proscribed Substances and through impermissible actions, energy therapy, and the forbiddance of receiving bribe.

Fiqh-i Darmān (Jurisprudence of Treatment) has collected information in a library research method and analyzed data and information based on Islamic fundamental and Jurisprudential Precepts with an Analytical-Ijtihadic Approach method. It infers the issues related to treatment, especially the Emergent Jurisprudential Issues in the field of medical jurisprudence, in order to clarify the Legal Obligations of the Accountable (Mukallaf) (patients and doctors) in dealing with diseases. ~~Repetitive Prose~~ and Undocumented Citations is one of the criticisms directed at the Fiqh-i Darmān book.

Fiqh-i Darmān (Jurisprudence of Treatment) has collected information in a library research method and analyzed data and information based on Islamic fundamental and Jurisprudential Precepts with an Analytical-Ijtihadic Approach method. It infers the issues related to treatment, especially the Emergent Jurisprudential Issues in the field of medical jurisprudence, in order to clarify the Legal Obligations of the Accountable (Mukallaf) (patients and doctors) in dealing with diseases. Redundancy and Undocumented Citations is one of the criticisms directed at the Fiqh-i Darmān book.

== Brief introduction ==

Line 101:

== Review and evaluation ==

~~Repetitive Prose~~ is one of the criticisms directed at the book Fiqh-i Darmān. In this book, written in Persian language, when referring to verses or hadiths, both the Arabic text and the Persian translation are mentioned consecutively, which has increased the volume of the book. This problem is more observable when the text of verses or hadiths is long (p. 98). Excessive lexical discussions and searches for the roots of words are other examples of ~~Repetitive Prose~~. For example, in examining the concept of patient’s consent, the author has dedicated several pages of the book to the study of the concept of consent and the Sections of human beings over themselves (pp. 107-123). The consecutive mention of the common fatwas of jurists is another example of ~~Repetitive Prose~~ in this book (pp. 371-372). The author has mentioned the text of several common fatwas in the appendices of the book and sometimes in the main text, while the brief mention of the sense of the fatwas could suffice.

Redundancy is one of the criticisms directed at the book Fiqh-i Darmān. In this book, written in Persian language, when referring to verses or hadiths, both the Arabic text and the Persian translation are mentioned consecutively, which has increased the volume of the book. This problem is more observable when the text of verses or hadiths is long (p. 98). Excessive lexical discussions and searches for the roots of words are other examples of Redundancy. For example, in examining the concept of patient’s consent, the author has dedicated several pages of the book to the study of the concept of consent and the Sections of human beings over themselves (pp. 107-123). The consecutive mention of the common fatwas of jurists is another example of Redundancy in this book (pp. 371-372). The author has mentioned the text of several common fatwas in the appendices of the book and sometimes in the main text, while the brief mention of the sense of the fatwas could suffice.

Among other criticisms of this book is that it quotes some sayings without providing reference to a specific source. In these cases, the author considers an idea as a basis and rejects or strengthens it without documenting it (p. 82).

== References ==

@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 * '''Abstract'''
 Jurisprudence of Treatment (in persian: [https://ency.feqhemoaser.com/fa/view/%D9%81%D9%82%D9%87_%D8%AF%D8%B1%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%86_(%DA%A9%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%A8) فقه درمان]) is a book in the field of [[Medical jurisprudence|medical jurisprudence]], authored by [[Muhammad-Ali Qāsimī]], that discusses the Jurisprudential Precepts of medical examination and treatment in four chapters and several statements. This book discusses topics such as the The Attending Physician’s Professional Qualification and lack of Professional Qualification, conditions for the permission of the doctor to look at the body of a patient of the Non-mahram and touch it, cases where it is necessary to obtain the permission of the patient or their guardian for examination and treatment, the role of medical examinations in proving crimes, whether the doctor is or is not to be held responsible if the patient has not signed an Informed Consent, the conditions for permission to treat with Proscribed Substances and through impermissible actions, energy therapy, and the forbiddance of receiving bribe.
-Fiqh-i Darmān (Jurisprudence of Treatment) has collected information in a library research method and analyzed data and information based on Islamic fundamental and Jurisprudential Precepts with an Analytical-Ijtihadic Approach method. It infers the issues related to treatment, especially the Emergent Jurisprudential Issues in the field of medical jurisprudence, in order to clarify the Legal Obligations of the Accountable (Mukallaf)  (patients and doctors) in dealing with diseases. Repetitive Prose and Undocumented Citations is one of the criticisms directed at the Fiqh-i Darmān book.
+Fiqh-i Darmān (Jurisprudence of Treatment) has collected information in a library research method and analyzed data and information based on Islamic fundamental and Jurisprudential Precepts with an Analytical-Ijtihadic Approach method. It infers the issues related to treatment, especially the Emergent Jurisprudential Issues in the field of medical jurisprudence, in order to clarify the Legal Obligations of the Accountable (Mukallaf)  (patients and doctors) in dealing with diseases. Redundancy and Undocumented Citations is one of the criticisms directed at the Fiqh-i Darmān book.
 == Brief introduction  ==
@@ Line 101: / Line 101: @@
 == Review and evaluation ==
-Repetitive Prose is one of the criticisms directed at the book Fiqh-i Darmān. In this book, written in Persian language, when referring to verses or hadiths, both the Arabic text and the Persian translation are mentioned consecutively, which has increased the volume of the book. This problem is more observable when the text of verses or hadiths is long (p. 98). Excessive lexical discussions and searches for the roots of words are other examples of Repetitive Prose. For example, in examining the concept of patient’s consent, the author has dedicated several pages of the book to the study of the concept of consent and the Sections of human beings over themselves (pp. 107-123). The consecutive mention of the common fatwas of jurists is another example of Repetitive Prose in this book (pp. 371-372). The author has mentioned the text of several common fatwas in the appendices of the book and sometimes in the main text, while the brief mention of the sense of the fatwas could suffice.
+Redundancy is one of the criticisms directed at the book Fiqh-i Darmān. In this book, written in Persian language, when referring to verses or hadiths, both the Arabic text and the Persian translation are mentioned consecutively, which has increased the volume of the book. This problem is more observable when the text of verses or hadiths is long (p. 98). Excessive lexical discussions and searches for the roots of words are other examples of Redundancy. For example, in examining the concept of patient’s consent, the author has dedicated several pages of the book to the study of the concept of consent and the Sections of human beings over themselves (pp. 107-123). The consecutive mention of the common fatwas of jurists is another example of Redundancy in this book (pp. 371-372). The author has mentioned the text of several common fatwas in the appendices of the book and sometimes in the main text, while the brief mention of the sense of the fatwas could suffice.
 Among other criticisms of this book is that it quotes some sayings without providing reference to a specific source. In these cases, the author considers an idea as a basis and rejects or strengthens it without documenting it (p. 82).
 == References ==

Jurisprudence of treatment (book): Difference between revisions