Jurisprudence of treatment (book)

Line 93:

By raising the question as to whether the competent doctor shall be held responsible or not in case of a harm to the patient or his death, the author of Fiqh-i Darmān, by mentioning the ideas of two groups of jurists, believes that if the competent doctor uses all his efforts and attempts at treating and curing the patient in Professional Diligence , if he does not obtain the patient’s informed consent about possible harms caused to the patient before the start of the treatment, he shall be responsible about the harms, and only in case of obtaining the informed consent, he will have no responsibility and liability (pp. 218-225).

=== Permission of Therapeutics involving Proscribed Substances ===

According to Qāsimī, Therapeutics involving Proscribed Substances such as Inebriants, narcotics and psychotropic drugs as well as with impermissible actions is forbidden in absolute terms, except when treatment is exclusive to the use of forbidden items (p. 256). Citing the priority of the rule of necessity over the primary rules on prohibition of using forbidden items, as well as the ~~verse on removing hardships~~, the hadith of the removal and other hadiths, he believes that in case of necessity, no prohibition has been set by the Lawmaker on the use of forbidden items, and eating, drinking and the other actions that are forbidden under normal conditions, shall be halal and permissible in cases of necessity (pp. 247-256).

According to Qāsimī, Therapeutics involving Proscribed Substances such as Inebriants, narcotics and psychotropic drugs as well as with impermissible actions is forbidden in absolute terms, except when treatment is exclusive to the use of forbidden items (p. 256). Citing the priority of the rule of necessity over the primary rules on prohibition of using forbidden items, as well as the (Quran 22:78), the hadith of the removal and other hadiths, he believes that in case of necessity, no prohibition has been set by the Lawmaker on the use of forbidden items, and eating, drinking and the other actions that are forbidden under normal conditions, shall be halal and permissible in cases of necessity (pp. 247-256).

=== Permissibility of receiving fees for practicing medicine and forbiddance of receiving bribe ===

Qāsimī questions the arguments of those who believe in the prohibition of receiving money in return for doing obligatory works, including the practice of medicine, and believes that there is no critique in receiving wages for medicine in all cases of objective, sufficient, recommended, and permissible obligation (pp. 379-404). According to him, it is permissible to receive Medical Honoraria even before beginning the treatment process (p. 405). Citing the forbiddance of obtaining wealth through unlawful ways as well as violation of the medical oath, he believes in the forbiddance of receiving bribe by doctors (p. 408).

@@ Line 93: / Line 93: @@
 By raising the question as to whether the competent doctor shall be held responsible or not in case of a harm to the patient or his death, the author of Fiqh-i Darmān, by mentioning the ideas of two groups of jurists, believes that if the competent doctor uses all his efforts and attempts at treating and curing the patient in Professional Diligence , if he does not obtain the patient’s informed consent about possible harms caused to the patient before the start of the treatment, he shall be responsible about the harms, and only in case of obtaining the informed consent, he will have no responsibility and liability (pp. 218-225).
 === Permission of Therapeutics involving Proscribed Substances  ===
-According to Qāsimī, Therapeutics involving Proscribed Substances such as Inebriants, narcotics and psychotropic drugs as well as with impermissible actions is forbidden in absolute terms, except when treatment is exclusive to the use of forbidden items (p. 256). Citing the priority of the rule of necessity over the primary rules on prohibition of using forbidden items, as well as the verse on removing hardships, the hadith of the removal and other hadiths, he believes that in case of necessity, no prohibition has been set by the Lawmaker on the use of forbidden items, and eating, drinking and the other actions that are forbidden under normal conditions, shall be halal and permissible in cases of necessity (pp. 247-256).
+According to Qāsimī, Therapeutics involving Proscribed Substances such as Inebriants, narcotics and psychotropic drugs as well as with impermissible actions is forbidden in absolute terms, except when treatment is exclusive to the use of forbidden items (p. 256). Citing the priority of the rule of necessity over the primary rules on prohibition of using forbidden items, as well as the (Quran 22:78), the hadith of the removal and other hadiths, he believes that in case of necessity, no prohibition has been set by the Lawmaker on the use of forbidden items, and eating, drinking and the other actions that are forbidden under normal conditions, shall be halal and permissible in cases of necessity (pp. 247-256).
 === Permissibility of receiving fees for practicing medicine and forbiddance of receiving bribe ===
 Qāsimī questions the arguments of those who believe in the prohibition of receiving money in return for doing obligatory works, including the practice of medicine, and believes that there is no critique in receiving wages for medicine in all cases of objective, sufficient, recommended, and permissible obligation (pp. 379-404). According to him, it is permissible to receive Medical Honoraria even before beginning the treatment process (p. 405). Citing the forbiddance of obtaining wealth through unlawful ways as well as violation of the medical oath, he believes in the forbiddance of receiving bribe by doctors (p. 408).

Jurisprudence of treatment (book): Difference between revisions