Sayyid Mostafa Mohaghegh Damad: Difference between revisions

M.zandi (talk | contribs)
M.zandi (talk | contribs)
Line 83: Line 83:


== Theory of the Separation of Caliphate and Imamate ==
== Theory of the Separation of Caliphate and Imamate ==
Mohaghegh Damad believes in the separation between caliphate and imamate. From his perspective, the caliphate, as a form and structure of government, is an earthly, executive, and non-sacred matter, while the imamate holds a religious, spiritual, and sacred position; therefore, the caliphate pertains to the political and executive management of society and can be administered by a non-infallible individual, but the imamate is a divine and spiritual status restricted to the Infallible Imams. In his view, the separation of these two concepts helps in a more precise understanding of Islamic history and the role of the Infallible Imams in the political developments of that era. Mohaghegh Damad explains this distinction by citing the peace treaty of Imam Hasan (AS) with Mu'awiyah. Based on his analysis, Imam Hasan (AS), by relinquishing the caliphate—meaning the political management of society—to Mu'awiyah, showed that the caliphate is separate from the imamate, and submission to the political conditions of that time did not mean relinquishing the religious and sacred position, but rather relinquishing the government. Therefore, the Infallible Imams can, according to the interests of the Islamic society, entrust the reins of executive affairs to a non-infallible person.<ref>Mohaghegh Damad, "Session on 'Peace and War, Enjoining Good and Forbidding Evil'."</ref>
Mohaghegh Damad believes in the separation between caliphate and imamate. He is of opinion that the caliphate as a form and structure of government is an earthly, executive, and non-sacred matter, while the imamate holds a religious, spiritual, and sacred position; therefore, the caliphate pertains to political and executive management of society and can be administered by non-infallible people, but the imamate is a divine and spiritual status restricted to the Infallible Imams. In his view, the separation of these two concepts helps us to understand the history of Islam and the role of the Infallible Imams in the political developments of that era more accurately. Mohaghegh Damad explains this distinction by citing the peace treaty between Imam Hasan (AS) and Mu'awiya. Based on his analysis, Imam Hasan (AS) ceded the caliphate, i.e. the political management, to Mu'awiya and so he showed that the caliphate is separate from the imamate and giving in to the political circumstances at that time did not mean giving up the religious and sacred position, but rather giving up the government. So, considering the interests of the Islamic society, the Infallible Imams can entrust the reins of executive affairs to a non-infallible person.<ref>Mohaghegh Damad, "Session on 'Peace and War, Enjoining Good and Forbidding Evil'."</ref>


== The Jurisprudential (Fiqhi) and Principles (Usuli) School of Akhund Khorasani ==
== The Jurisprudential (Fiqhi) and Principles (Usuli) School of Akhund Khorasani ==