Essentials of Political Jurisprudence (Book): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
}} | }} | ||
* '''abstract''' | * '''abstract''' | ||
'''Essentials of Political Jurisprudence'''(in persian: [https://ency.feqhemoaser.com/fa/view/%D8%A8%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B3%D8%AA%D9%87%E2%80%8C%D9%87%D8%A7%DB%8C_%D9%81%D9%82%D9%87_%D8%B3%DB%8C%D8%A7%D8%B3%DB%8C_(%DA%A9%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%A8) بایستههای فقه سیاسی]) presents a concise and revised edition of the [[Ten-volume work "Political Jurisprudence"|ten-volume work "Political Jurisprudence"]] by [[ | '''Essentials of Political Jurisprudence''' (in persian: [https://ency.feqhemoaser.com/fa/view/%D8%A8%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B3%D8%AA%D9%87%E2%80%8C%D9%87%D8%A7%DB%8C_%D9%81%D9%82%D9%87_%D8%B3%DB%8C%D8%A7%D8%B3%DB%8C_(%DA%A9%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%A8) بایستههای فقه سیاسی]) presents a concise and revised edition of the [[Ten-volume work "Political Jurisprudence"|ten-volume work "Political Jurisprudence"]] by [[Abbasali Amid Zanjani]]. Compiled by Amid Zanjani and Ebrahim Musizadeh, this book explores the thousand-year history of the [[Theory of Velayat-e Faqih|theory of Velayat-e Faqih]], tracing its development from Sheikh Saduq to [[Sayyid Ruhollah Musavi Khomeini|Imam Khomeini]], and addresses various issues of [[Political jurisprudence|political jurisprudence]], including the necessity of establishing a government and the rights of the people. | ||
The authors of the book categorize the historical developments of political jurisprudence into four distinct periods: "Ancient Times," "The Structuring of Political Jurisprudence within the Framework of Ijtihad," "Independent Transformations in Political Jurisprudence," and "Major Explanations in Political Jurisprudence." They illustrate the prominent ideas from each period. According to them, topics such as justice, enjoining good and forbidding wrong, public interest, council, allegiance, representation of the people, and the limited authority of Islamic jurists or democratic governance are issues in political jurisprudence that have been examined by scholars throughout this extensive period. | The authors of the book categorize the historical developments of political jurisprudence into four distinct periods: "Ancient Times," "The Structuring of Political Jurisprudence within the Framework of Ijtihad," "Independent Transformations in Political Jurisprudence," and "Major Explanations in Political Jurisprudence." They illustrate the prominent ideas from each period. According to them, topics such as justice, enjoining good and forbidding wrong, public interest, council, allegiance, representation of the people, and the limited authority of Islamic jurists or democratic governance are issues in political jurisprudence that have been examined by scholars throughout this extensive period. | ||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
In the eighth volume of the ten-volume series "Political Jurisprudence," titled "Jurisprudence and Politics," Amid Zanjani explores Islamic political thought, the theory of the Velayat-e Faqih (Guardianship of the Jurist), and its scope of authority through the perspectives of approximately thirty prominent Shia jurists. This analysis is organized into three historical categories, spanning from Sheikh Saduq to Imam Khomeini. The first chapter of this book (Essentials of Political Jurisprudence) serves as a summary of the eighth volume and examines the developments in political jurisprudence over the past thousand years, divided into four periods and viewed through the perspectives of ten distinguished jurists. | In the eighth volume of the ten-volume series "Political Jurisprudence," titled "Jurisprudence and Politics," Amid Zanjani explores Islamic political thought, the theory of the Velayat-e Faqih (Guardianship of the Jurist), and its scope of authority through the perspectives of approximately thirty prominent Shia jurists. This analysis is organized into three historical categories, spanning from Sheikh Saduq to Imam Khomeini. The first chapter of this book (Essentials of Political Jurisprudence) serves as a summary of the eighth volume and examines the developments in political jurisprudence over the past thousand years, divided into four periods and viewed through the perspectives of ten distinguished jurists. | ||
The book examines the first period, referred to as the "Era of the Ancients" (approximately 250 years), through the perspectives of prominent scholars such as Sheikh Saduq, Sheikh Mufid, Sheikh Tusi, and Ibn Idris, as reflected in their works. The second period, titled "The Systematization of Political Jurisprudence within the Framework of Ijtihad," focuses on the contributions of Mohaghegh Helli and Mohaghegh Karaki. The authors introduce the third period, named "Independent Transformation in Political Jurisprudence," which follows the revival of ijtihad by Vahid Behbahani (d. 1208 AH); however, they limit their analysis of political jurisprudence to the works of Mohammad Mahdi Naraqi (Awā'id al-Ayyām) and Mohammad Hasan Najafi (Jawāhir al-Kalām). In the fourth period, titled "Major Justifications in the Explanation of Political Jurisprudence," the political thoughts of two contemporary jurists are discussed in relation to two significant historical phases in Iran: the views of [[Mirza | The book examines the first period, referred to as the "Era of the Ancients" (approximately 250 years), through the perspectives of prominent scholars such as Sheikh Saduq, Sheikh Mufid, Sheikh Tusi, and Ibn Idris, as reflected in their works. The second period, titled "The Systematization of Political Jurisprudence within the Framework of Ijtihad," focuses on the contributions of Mohaghegh Helli and Mohaghegh Karaki. The authors introduce the third period, named "Independent Transformation in Political Jurisprudence," which follows the revival of ijtihad by Vahid Behbahani (d. 1208 AH); however, they limit their analysis of political jurisprudence to the works of Mohammad Mahdi Naraqi (Awā'id al-Ayyām) and Mohammad Hasan Najafi (Jawāhir al-Kalām). In the fourth period, titled "Major Justifications in the Explanation of Political Jurisprudence," the political thoughts of two contemporary jurists are discussed in relation to two significant historical phases in Iran: the views of [[Mirza Mohammad-Hossein Gharavi Na'ini|Mirza Na'ini]] during the [[Constitutional Revolution]] and the ideas of [[Sayyid Ruhollah Musavi Khomeini|Imam Khomeini]] regarding the monarchical and [[Islamic Republic systems]] (pp. 13-48). | ||
==The necessity of establishing a government and protecting the rights of the people== | ==The necessity of establishing a government and protecting the rights of the people== | ||
According to the author, the historical context of political jurisprudence can be traced through the categorization of jurisprudential discussions and the arrangement of jurisprudential literature among Shia and Sunni scholars. | According to the author, the historical context of political jurisprudence can be traced through the categorization of jurisprudential discussions and the arrangement of jurisprudential literature among Shia and Sunni scholars. | ||
| Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
In the fourth section, the authors present and critique two theories: "Islamic Free Economy" and "Islamic Socialist Economy." They characterize the economic framework outlined in the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran as a balanced and moderated theory that integrates elements from both Islamic Free Economy and Islamic Socialism. They also acknowledge the significant role of Martyr Beheshti in formulating and institutionalizing these concepts within the 1979 Constitution. Furthermore, in the fifth section, they identify the methodology of Islamic political economy and its major challenge, which is the divergence of jurisprudential opinions. In the sixth section, they explore the concept of justice within Islamic political economy by examining Imam Khomeini's perspective, emphasizing the security of the oppressed and the preservation of Islamic values and symbols as fundamental components of his ideology (pp. 261-311). | In the fourth section, the authors present and critique two theories: "Islamic Free Economy" and "Islamic Socialist Economy." They characterize the economic framework outlined in the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran as a balanced and moderated theory that integrates elements from both Islamic Free Economy and Islamic Socialism. They also acknowledge the significant role of Martyr Beheshti in formulating and institutionalizing these concepts within the 1979 Constitution. Furthermore, in the fifth section, they identify the methodology of Islamic political economy and its major challenge, which is the divergence of jurisprudential opinions. In the sixth section, they explore the concept of justice within Islamic political economy by examining Imam Khomeini's perspective, emphasizing the security of the oppressed and the preservation of Islamic values and symbols as fundamental components of his ideology (pp. 261-311). | ||
[[fa:بایستههای فقه سیاسی (کتاب)]] | [[fa:بایستههای فقه سیاسی (کتاب)]] | ||
[[ | [[Category:Bibliography Articles]] | ||
[[ | [[Category:Books by Abbasali Amid Zanjani]] | ||