Jihad in Contemporary Shia Fiqh (book)

(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)

Line 127:

# The jurist must make the final decision in consultation with experts (such as the Supreme National Security Council). This foundation faces the same previous problem, as the guardian jurist does not become an expert after consulting.

# The jurist must delegate these matters to experts, as [[Sayyid Ruhollah ~~Mousavi~~ Khomeini|Imam Khomeini]] did. In the author's opinion, this theory moves governance away from centralism and individualism, provided that the political arena is genuinely open to political parties and groups (pp. 144-146).

# The jurist must delegate these matters to experts, as [[Sayyid Ruhollah Musavi Khomeini|Imam Khomeini]] did. In the author's opinion, this theory moves governance away from centralism and individualism, provided that the political arena is genuinely open to political parties and groups (pp. 144-146).

==Rising up against an Unjust Ruler==

Line 137:

The author compares the narrations on enjoining good and forbidding evil with the narrations prohibiting rising up against an unjust ruler, and believes that these narrations are not contradictory and that the narrations prohibiting uprising state an instance where [[enjoining good and forbidding evil]] is not permissible. According to Soroush Mahallati, the jurisprudential and practical approach of jurists of not getting involved with the wielders of power, especially in situations that may have dangerous and corrupting consequences, is not only influenced by the narrations prohibiting rising up against an unjust ruler, but they have also been influenced by the narrations on enjoining good and forbidding evil (pp. 177-183).

[[~~Category~~:~~Bibliographical Articles]]~~

[[category: books by Mohammad Surush Mahallati]]

~~[[Category:Books~~ by Mohammad ~~Soroush~~ Mahallati]]

[[Category:Books on Political Fiqh in Persian]]

[[~~category~~:~~book review~~]]

[[Category:Bibliography Articles]]

[[fa:جهاد در فقه معاصر شیعه (کتاب)]]

@@ Line 127: / Line 127: @@
 # The jurist must make the final decision in consultation with experts (such as the Supreme National Security Council). This foundation faces the same previous problem, as the guardian jurist does not become an expert after consulting.
-# The jurist must delegate these matters to experts, as [[Sayyid Ruhollah Mousavi Khomeini|Imam Khomeini]] did. In the author's opinion, this theory moves governance away from centralism and individualism, provided that the political arena is genuinely open to political parties and groups (pp. 144-146).
+# The jurist must delegate these matters to experts, as [[Sayyid Ruhollah Musavi Khomeini|Imam Khomeini]] did. In the author's opinion, this theory moves governance away from centralism and individualism, provided that the political arena is genuinely open to political parties and groups (pp. 144-146).
 ==Rising up against an Unjust Ruler==
@@ Line 137: / Line 137: @@
 The author compares the narrations on enjoining good and forbidding evil with the narrations prohibiting rising up against an unjust ruler, and believes that these narrations are not contradictory and that the narrations prohibiting uprising state an instance where [[enjoining good and forbidding evil]] is not permissible. According to Soroush Mahallati, the jurisprudential and practical approach of jurists of not getting involved with the wielders of power, especially in situations that may have dangerous and corrupting consequences, is not only influenced by the narrations prohibiting rising up against an unjust ruler, but they have also been influenced by the narrations on enjoining good and forbidding evil (pp. 177-183).
-[[Category:Bibliographical Articles]]
+[[category: books by Mohammad Surush Mahallati]]
-[[Category:Books by Mohammad Soroush Mahallati]]
 [[Category:Books on Political Fiqh in Persian]]
-[[category:book review]]
+[[Category:Bibliography Articles]]
 [[fa:جهاد در فقه معاصر شیعه (کتاب)]]

Jihad in Contemporary Shia Fiqh (book): Difference between revisions