Abbasali Amid Zanjani: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Author | {{Author | ||
|author = | |author = Mahdi Khosravi Sereshki | ||
|author2 = | |author2 = | ||
|author3 = | |author3 = | ||
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
Amid Zanjani emphasizes the ideological and monotheistic element of Islamic political thought and proposes theories consistent with imamat or khilafat for the legitimacy of the political systems of Islamic countries. He reports that along with following the path of the West and the current experience of secular man, Islamic democracy, nationalism, and modernism are three ideas that Islamic thinkers in different Islamic countries have welcomed.<ref>Political Jurisprudence, vol. 10, pp. 40 to 60.</ref> He believes that the ideology of nationalism, even Arab nationalism (the Arab nation), is in conflict with the unity of the Islamic umma and is aligned with racism. Although some have used a combination of Arab and Islamic nationalism, in contrast, someone like Seyyed Jamaluddin Asadabadi has presented the "Islamic society" in opposition to the "Arab society."<ref>Political Jurisprudence, vol. 10, pp. 61 to 83.</ref> | Amid Zanjani emphasizes the ideological and monotheistic element of Islamic political thought and proposes theories consistent with imamat or khilafat for the legitimacy of the political systems of Islamic countries. He reports that along with following the path of the West and the current experience of secular man, Islamic democracy, nationalism, and modernism are three ideas that Islamic thinkers in different Islamic countries have welcomed.<ref>Political Jurisprudence, vol. 10, pp. 40 to 60.</ref> He believes that the ideology of nationalism, even Arab nationalism (the Arab nation), is in conflict with the unity of the Islamic umma and is aligned with racism. Although some have used a combination of Arab and Islamic nationalism, in contrast, someone like Seyyed Jamaluddin Asadabadi has presented the "Islamic society" in opposition to the "Arab society."<ref>Political Jurisprudence, vol. 10, pp. 61 to 83.</ref> | ||
In the discussion of "Iranian nationalism," Amid rejects the accusation that Shiism is a kind of Iranian nationalism movement against the ruling Islam and the national feeling of Iranians in compensating for the defeat against Arab Islam.<ref>Political Jurisprudence, vol. 10, pp. 84 to 122.</ref> While emphasizing the protection of the past heritage and remaining committed to religious tradition and heritage, he does not necessarily consider it backwardness and turning away from modernism and accepts modernism in executive affairs and "what has no text in it" and in the face of progressive Islam (supporters of modernism) and Salafi Islam (opponents of modernism) calls his name "moderate Islam," which he also sees Allameh Tabatabai and [[ | In the discussion of "Iranian nationalism," Amid rejects the accusation that Shiism is a kind of Iranian nationalism movement against the ruling Islam and the national feeling of Iranians in compensating for the defeat against Arab Islam.<ref>Political Jurisprudence, vol. 10, pp. 84 to 122.</ref> While emphasizing the protection of the past heritage and remaining committed to religious tradition and heritage, he does not necessarily consider it backwardness and turning away from modernism and accepts modernism in executive affairs and "what has no text in it" and in the face of progressive Islam (supporters of modernism) and Salafi Islam (opponents of modernism) calls his name "moderate Islam," which he also sees Allameh Tabatabai and [[Sayyid Ruhollah Musavi Khomeini]] in this category.<ref>Political Jurisprudence, vol. 10, pp. 204 to 218.</ref> | ||
===The Challenge of Republicanism and Islamism and the Vulnerability of the Islamic Revolution=== | ===The Challenge of Republicanism and Islamism and the Vulnerability of the Islamic Revolution=== | ||