Jihad in Contemporary Shia Fiqh (book): Difference between revisions

Sarfipour (talk | contribs)
Created page with "{{Author |author = Hadi Sadeghi |author2 = |author3 = |compiler = |editor1 = |editor2 = |editor3 = }} {{infobox book | name = Jihad in Contemporary Shia Fiqh | image = Jihad in Contemporary Shia Fiqh.jpg | image_size = | caption = | other_names = | author = Mohammad Soroush Mahallati | writing_date = | topic = Political Fiqh | style = Argumentative-Critical | language = Persian | editor = | revised_by = | compiled_by = | illustrator = | cover_designer = | v..."
 
Sarfipour (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 45: Line 45:
* '''Abstract'''
* '''Abstract'''


*Jihad in Contemporary Shia Fiqh* is a book written by [[Mohammad Soroush Mahallati]] in the field of [[Political Fiqh]]. In this work, the concept of jihad is explained in an argumentative-critical manner based on the views of [[Sayyid Abu al-Qasim al-Khoei]]. By critiquing Khoei's perspective on jihad, the author delineates the legitimacy and scope of jihad in Islam. Khoei divides jihad into three types (jihad against polytheists, the People of the Book, and rebels) and considers it obligatory in these cases.
*'''Jihad in Contemporary Shia Fiqh''' is a book written by [[Mohammad Soroush Mahallati]] in the field of [[Political Fiqh]]. In this work, the concept of jihad is explained in an argumentative-critical manner based on the views of [[Sayyid Abu al-Qasim al-Khoei]]. By critiquing Khoei's perspective on jihad, the author delineates the legitimacy and scope of jihad in Islam. Khoei divides jihad into three types (jihad against polytheists, the People of the Book, and rebels) and considers it obligatory in these cases.


In contrast, the author critiques this view, arguing that jihad against polytheists is obligatory only if they commit hostile acts, and fighting the [[People of the Book]] is obligatory only if they fail to adhere to the dhimma pact. He also critiques Khoei's view on the [[Guardianship of the Jurist]] and his role in the decision-making process for jihad.
In contrast, the author critiques this view, arguing that jihad against polytheists is obligatory only if they commit hostile acts, and fighting the [[People of the Book]] is obligatory only if they fail to adhere to the dhimma pact. He also critiques Khoei's view on the [[Guardianship of the Jurist]] and his role in the decision-making process for jihad.